• 0 Posts
  • 28 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 17th, 2023

help-circle



  • ashenblood@sh.itjust.workstoScience Memes@mander.xyzdegree in bamf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    8 months ago

    It has nothing to do with subjugation, it’s just preference. I prefer to spend time with my family, I’m not subjugating other people by doing so.

    But in the context of a corporate oligarchy where my absurd wealth means that my family is unfairly enriched to the detriment of the workers that I employ, it becomes subjugation. It’s not humans, it’s the socioeconomic system that exists that is causing all of this suffering and needs to be supplanted.


  • ashenblood@sh.itjust.workstoScience Memes@mander.xyzdegree in bamf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    8 months ago

    Doesn’t your paper you linked imply it isn’t so obvious?

    Yeah sure, in the absence of any other data.

    If you refuse to acknowledge that people like people similar to themselves, you’re not being honest with yourself, let alone me.

    What is the systemic problem/problematic behavior that you are trying to solve? You clearly believe that white men are especially discriminatory towards other groups, which isn’t crazy, although I disagree. But are you so naive to think that if we replaced the powerful white men with powerful hispanic women (or any other combination of race and gender), racial and gender-based discrimination would suddenly end? I’m just pointing out the inconvenient truth that the system would still be biased and unfair, just with different winners and losers.

    In my view, the fact that some white men are biased for or against certain groups is completely insignificant and irrelevant to solving the problems that society faces today. It’s the fundamental structure of the economic and political system that naturally results in the few individuals at the top of the hierarchy expressing a large degree of control and domination over the rest of the society.



  • ashenblood@sh.itjust.workstoScience Memes@mander.xyzdegree in bamf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    I agree. People tend to ascribe inherent traits to other groups, when in fact observed behaviors can usually be traced not to inherent dispositions, but to specific environmental conditions that incentivize said behaviors.

    For instance, a white man in our current social environment who exhibits a confident, assertive attitude is well situated to succeed. White men are expected to be competent and often rewarded for appearing competent, so they sometimes attempt to exaggerate their competence in order to meet the perceived expectations.


  • ashenblood@sh.itjust.workstoScience Memes@mander.xyzdegree in bamf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    I’m sorry that happened to you.

    However, your anecdotal experience is just that. I have been subject to exponentially more racist abuse from black individuals than from individuals of any other race. Does that indicate to you that we should be “pushing back” against black racists? Obviously not, because my personal experience is not enough to draw any conclusions about society as a whole.

    In fact, you’re condescending me right now. You’re implying that your personal judgment supercedes my rational argument. I provide sources and construct an argument, and you respond “this is news to me” (condescending and dismissing my argument) and proceed to explain that what I’m saying can’t possibly be true, because it contradicts your personal viewpoint.


  • ashenblood@sh.itjust.workstoScience Memes@mander.xyzdegree in bamf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    That’s not my main argument, it’s merely a supporting clause.

    OP asserted that

    white men will treat anyone of any other demographic as less than equals.

    I countered that by pointing out that it’s obvious that any human being tends to prefer people who they consider similar to themselves. That’s my main argument.

    And if that is true, then attempting to frame such behavior as particular to white men is just silly and unproductive.

    I obviously can’t definitively measure the amount of social stigma around white male prejudice, but I don’t need to. I’m not saying that white men are definitely less biased than other demographics, I’m merely pointing out that it’s a distinct possibility, even as you all indicate that they are the demographic most deserving of condemnation for such behavior.

    Now, one could make the argument that even though white men may not be especially biased, the effects of their bias may have greater impacts on other demographics due to the disproportionate amount of power they collectively wield. I think that’s a fair point, but it doesn’t really hold any ethical implications, it’s simply a description of a material reality.


  • ashenblood@sh.itjust.workstoScience Memes@mander.xyzdegree in bamf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    This is a consistent and very unpleasant fact of the world that white men will treat anyone of any other demographic as less than equals.

    Citation needed.

    In all seriousness, I understand your point and respect you for trying to deconstruct the mechanics of privilege.

    But I just factually disagree with your assertion. I would argue that every human being has an inherent preference for people that they perceive as similar to themselves in some way, and this can result in bias along racial or gender lines. However, this arguably applies less to white men than any other demographic, because such behavior is so consistently condemned and shamed when exhibited by white men.

    In contrast, people of other demographics are less frequently made aware of their own biases, because calling it out has not been construed as some kind of ethical imperative, as it has with white men.

    It’s also well documented that women have a much stronger in-group bias compared to men.

    In essence, women can be characterized as “If I am good and I am female, females are good,” whereas men can be characterized as “Even if I am good and I am male, men are not necessarily good.” This sex difference in cognitive balance suggests that a mechanism that promotes female preference in women does not similarly contribute to male preference for men.

    https://rutgerssocialcognitionlab.weebly.com/uploads/1/3/9/7/13979590/rudmangoodwin2004jpsp.pdf


  • ashenblood@sh.itjust.workstoAnime@lemmy.mlwhy? how?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    In that case, I suggest you shut down the community. At this point the core userbase and mods have moved to another location and this community only serves to confuse noobs and casuals.

    I don’t blame you for not wanting to research the veracity of pedo claims, but this is within your control as admins. If you have a community that is unmoderated and frequently taking up admin time and resources, simply shut it down.






  • Yes, as we know, the notability of national accomplishments diminishes as a function of time… other nations would never consider being proud of anything their ancestors accomplished before they were born. Lmao

    If you don’t have enough things to be proud of as an American, which nationality would be good enough to meet your standards?


  • Very strange argument. It seems like you’re bad at those games and created some elaborate theory to rationalize it. Class based games require just as much, if not more, skill than non-class based games. As the number of classes increases, the total amount of knowledge required and variety of techniques available also tends to increase.

    Professional players do optimize the fun out of a game, but that’s totally unrelated to the point you were trying to make.