Policy-wise it is the same Grand Old Party. The vibe and rhetoric is different, but the policy is mostly all there.
Policy-wise it is the same Grand Old Party. The vibe and rhetoric is different, but the policy is mostly all there.
The campaign has been changing its tone depending on audience. In places like Michigan they’re doing this, but outside seing districts they’ve been banging the war drums for Israel.
So the lack of faith in the messaging isn’t without warrant.
And here I was of the general impression the user in question was just a bot that reposts the subreddit.
No one is really checking where and how people are operating from for those nuances to come out.
Judging from the points being made here in this thread, clearly there was little reading of the article to begin with.
Even article headline uses ‘Arab-American’ and ‘Pro-palestinian’ interchangeably. The perfect level of wrong that creates a bunch of uncertainty and confusion.
another country
Interesting terminology.
their customers to jump ship?
To where?
This is the calculus.
I’m still waiting for evidence of this supposed “apartheid” that people keep going on about.
It has been evidenced and been in discourse widely and long enough to have its own wikipedia entry. Human rights organizations like Amnesty International have definitely made the case. What evidence are you waiting for?
Also, the reference to Israel being an “apartheid state” is the most ludicrous statement and anyone who expressed it can be safely ignored.
Well I’d love to hear the argument that tries to back this statement up.
I am interested to see how downballot elections are impacted. It will be interesting to see how pro-palestinian candidates that survived their primaries compare to the presidenial race.
Will they win where Kamala loses? Or vice versa, etc?
I have maintained such a PC and kept the old parts long enough that I rebuilt the original PC after fully upgrading and replacing it.
So I dunno what you call it.
Given the voracious appetite for drone kill clips, “Got the footage?” was likely front and center.
He really should’ve brought a cowbell to signal the audience.
Goddamn. That’s not even doctored. If curious here’s a link to it: https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_entry/reservist-eulogized-for-desire-to-take-revenge-against-gazans-setting-home-on-fire-to-boost-morale/
Glusencamp-Perez ran on opposing Biden and working with Republicans.
Kent ran on opposing Perez for being a Democrat.
Absolutely insane.
no politics, merely the human hierarchical structure of control.
I’d love to hear the perspective where this makes sense.
Two parties, one donor class.
I used to be worried about having to idle on a hill while driving a manual transmission vehicle. Like backsweat.
But I got used to it. Time and practice. You start to see all the subtle motions and patterns; you start to know what you didn’t know you didn’t know.
Now it is just a basic part of the driving experience. It’s a road condition, like weather. Voting, especially in federal elections and especially the general one every four years for president, is not the only or even the main course of politics.
Same story with parallel parking–which would be, I dunno: primary voting in this metaphor. Where the promise of a better way gets crammed between two other poorly parked cars and you always end up a few inches too far from the curb.
The biggest range of ‘surplus’ for men coincides with the highest gap in education and employment.
https://english.hani.co.kr/arti/english_edition/e_national/1158095.html
It seems like to me that women are getting educations but don’t find work in South Korea. But they are able to leave the country to find work when they aren’t hired domestically.
So I wonder if these numbers include Koreans living abroad.
No disagreement that the campaign is, in fact, doing the campaigning thing.
A good campaign presents their intended policies consistently and favorably. It sells the electorate on casting their vote.
A poor campaign favorably presents inconsistent policies in a vague manner. It erodes faith in what the electorate is voting for.