Die Dänen haben also angefangen ihre Eroberungsträume in die Tat umzusetzen und sich Sylt als erstes geschnappt. Macht Sinn, die kennen sich mit Inseln aus.
Außerdem:
*Dusseldorf
/j
Die Dänen haben also angefangen ihre Eroberungsträume in die Tat umzusetzen und sich Sylt als erstes geschnappt. Macht Sinn, die kennen sich mit Inseln aus.
Außerdem:
*Dusseldorf
/j
Google erfindet Transformer. Google schafft es nicht Transformer zur Übersetzung von Texten einzusetzen, was besonders ironisch ist, da in dem initialen Paper der Transformer z.B. an EN <-> FR Übersetzungen demonstriert wurde.
OpenAI nutzt Transformer für ChatGPT und geht durch die Decke.
DeepL nutzt angepassten Transformer und liefert gute Ergebnisse (wenn auch nicht makellos).
Google bleibt sich treu, indem Google-Übersetzungen scheiße bleiben.
because some bureaucratic board has been bullied into being quiet about it
That’s a bold thing to claim.
They are not quiet about this.
And yes, until there is sufficient proof for the genocide allegations and/or the ICJ rules it as such, I can’t confidently say for myself that it’s genocide.
There is a tremendous amount of work invested in this case by people much more qualified than you or me.
Still, from my side this is in no way a justification for the cruel deaths of so many innocents. Civilian casualties are in no way tolerable for me.
That’s indeed unbelievably cruel.
This does not constitute a genocide though.
Humans are not made to kill other humans. And those who fight the wars of the mighty, are those who are among the ones who suffer the most.
War is really stupid. And it’s astonishing how we continue to be such a stupid species. Given how far we’ve come, one would think that we’ve finally realized how much humanity could achieve if we were working together instead of killing each other.
By the way:
It’s obvious that what Israel is doing is very much a genocide
The international court of justice has not ruled on this yet, but continues to observe and investigate whether such genocide allegations could apply.
However, I am not a fan of anyone who practises or participates in wars and so easily tolerates the deaths of innocents.
The artist needs to use the brain and translate a lot, and I mean an awful lot, of the information seen in the model (3d space) into 2d.
Close one eye or put an eyepatch on. I’d expect this makes 3D -> 2D transformations easier after a while.
Hat jemand Beispielsätze für das drittplatzierte Wort “Schere”? In der jugendsprachlichen Bedeutung natürlich.
Are you sure?
Yes.
This seems pretty nazi to me.
Tolerating civilian casualties within war-efforts is an extremely different thing than specifically favouring to hunt and eradicate them while possibly propagating some narrative like they are lesser humans or some fucked up racist shit like that. If that’s your standpoint on labeling Nazis however, then every nation which ever participated in a hot war with civilian casualties is probably pretty nazi to you.
Also germans online are one of the loud supporters of yet another genocide.
Not in my experience. But sure, it’s good emotional bait to blindly generalise over all germans and call them Nazis who favour genocide. How about you look for some verifiable numbers before reasoning from your individual experience with “online germans”?
Here:
Die militärische Reaktion Israels auf die Terror-Anschläge der Hamas vom 7. Oktober 2023 geht inzwischen für mehr als die Hälfte (57 Prozent) zu weit (+7 im Vgl. zu März), jeder Fünfte (21 Prozent) hält sie für angemessen (-7), für 4 Prozent geht sie nicht weit genug (-1).
Source: press report about a representative survey on the opinions of german’s regarding Israel’s war efforts.
https://presse.wdr.de/plounge/tv/das_erste/2024/08/20240808_ard_deutschlandtrend_israel.html
(From last August.)
Translation:
“The military response of Israel to the Hamas terror attacks on October 7, 2023, now goes too far for more than half (57 percent) of people (+7 compared to March), one in five (21 percent) considers it appropriate (-7), and for 4 percent it does not go far enough (-1).”
On a side note, the article you’ve linked from middle east monitor cited the foreign minister of Germany a bit wrong. Here is the official full translation of her speech: https://www.auswaertiges-amt.de/en/newsroom/news/-/2679832
With the following section in the middle east monitor article:
‘Self-defence means not only attacking terrorists but destroying them. When Hamas terrorists hide behind people, behind schools… civilian places lose their protected status because terrorists abuse it.’
And here the full official translation of that part:
That’s why we have made it clear time and again that self-defence means, of course, not only attacking terrorists, but also destroying them. This’s why I have made it so clear that when Hamas terrorists hide behind people, behind schools, then we end up in very difficult waters. But we’re not shying away from this. This is why I made it clear at the United Nations that civilian sites could lose their protected status if terrorists abuse this status.
The article did not appropriately mark the sections which were omitted in the quote. It also changed words, omitted words or sections without marking it and thereby changed the tone of the quote and misrepresented it in a way significant enough for me to be so nitpicky about it.
Most importantly, the minister highlights, that terrorists abusing protected civilian sites poses a very difficult situation which could potentially lead to a loss of the protection status.
Furthermore, she goes on about the importance of humanitarian aid in Gaza. And also remarks how Germany supports the two-state solution to ensure security in the region, peace for Palestine and peace for Israel.
Does that sound like Nazis to you?
Interesting idea. I am eager to see whether this can be further confirmed or not.
Please, before shitting all over Germany again with Nazi accusations and whatnot, keep in mind that this was demanded by populistic, right-wing politicians, who are – luckily – currently not running the government, but are in the opposition.
From the article:
Politicians in Germany think that climate activist Greta Thunberg should be banned from entering the country over her participation in pro-Palestinian protests, according to the domestic policy spokesman for Germany’s biggest opposition party, the Christian Democratic Union.
Surely you can call them out for it, but neither do they represent Germany, nor are they even running the national government.
Ken hat aber viel mehr Grips und Anstand (zumindest am Ende des Films).
For the non-roboticists: SLAM = Simultaneous Localization And Mapping.
In robot navigation problems we often face the problem to get a grasp of the environment and the robot’s position in it. It’s easier if there’s already a map provided and some sort of external observer who knows where the robot is relative to the map.
Since people don’t usually go into your home to map it out and install some sensors in order to locate the robot, SLAM is the way to go. While moving through an environment, a map of the environment is created and by utilzing some fancy techniques based on sensor data like from cameras, mic+loudspeaker, LIDAR or whatever, it is possible to also infer the robot’s position.
When no one was looking.
“Warum ließt du eigentlich ständig wahllos irgendwelche Wikipedia-Artikel?”
*liest
So sieht’s aus. Man kann es niemandem recht machen. Und deswegen ist man in der moralischen Überlehenheit Chrome weiterzunutzen. Weil warum auch ein bisschen besser machen, wenn es schlechter geht?
Ama! Vive! Speculatius!
Großes Latinum hat sich definitiv gelohnt.
es gibt Paper die frühere Paper in Frage stellen, teils von deren ursprünglichen Autor:innen
Eine Geschichte so alt wie die Wissenschaft.
Der andere Teil hängt an der Decke. Ist daher grad nicht sichtbar. /j