Which reminds me of that old joke: “but you fuck one coach…”
Edit: just spotted my typo… I’ll leave it in😊
Which reminds me of that old joke: “but you fuck one coach…”
Edit: just spotted my typo… I’ll leave it in😊
Well, that’s been the basis for some other products. AMD and Intel comes to mind😊 They both have IP the other need and historically Intel has been the dominant one, but now the tables have turned somewhat.
Well, even 84% sunshine transmitted is still rather shiny and is more than what is available at night.
Exactly. His followers expect there to have been an audience and those fictional people should have been crazy about it…
And to make it worse, they are none too concerned with facts to begin with.
Oh, welcome to the eu. Speed limits are going down, generally. At least in this nick of the woods, we aren’t driving as fast as in the eighties. The goal is zero Trafic fatalities.
Oh, it’s funny because it’s true.
Now I need to go cry in a corner, because it’s true
I feel that is the issue with this post to begin with. Is it a shitpost or not? Seems more like a load of hot air to me
Had blocking news and access to information been in the cards, as you describe, there would be another discussion. This is not it. The closest this comes is to block a linkaggregator. One that has been deemed to violate the laws in its area of business and being reluctant to take steps to rectify the situation.
This being the supreme court doing it does bring up the question of democratic decision making, which famiously has been proven by other countries recently. Although they also gave their president the power to remove themselves from office, if I’ve understood that particular debacle correctly.
deleted by creator
That’s not a straight line, although it is possible to follow without changing direction😊
Well… Its built on statistics and statistical inference will return to the mean eventually. If all it ever gets to train on is closer and closer to the mean, there will be nothing left to work with. It will all be the average…
So “it was only a joke” is also back on the menu? Wow, times are rolling back fast!
Even the term itself is a generalising stereotype. But it we are to have a somewhat serious discussion about it, I’d say It’s a human condition, not a gendered condition. For example, given what is (not) known about our respective genders, you felt the need to explain this.
So stereotyping gender is back on the menu? Are hair color jokes still taboo?
An LLM once explained to me that it didn’t know, it simulated an answer. I found that descriptive.
I did not in any way mean to suggest sensitivity is not a factor, only to suggest that light sensitivity may be more of a spectrum and that there are persons living in a darker world than others. So, it may not be a person on the top of the bell curve that need more light, but someone on the other end of the spectrum entirely.
Since the top comment in this thread was about needing more light in an already bright room i meamt to say that there might be reasons why people around us prefer 1 or 100000 lumen…
Apparently all eyes are not created equal in ability to transfer light to the retina. Some has narrower or wider fields of vision as well. So, where your eyes may be well adapted to low light levels, others may not be. In a world with no artificial shadows and the sun high on the sky for most of the year, being able to filter out sun light might have been a pro, while now needing lots of artificial lights to see straight.
A flayer shooter with Oz, you say? Well, the lore is there.
I never said anyone did, i was just reminded about a joke describing how some actions overshadows other activities when retold among peers.