I kind of like splitting hairs. It’s a god way to hone my opinion on things.
If people don’t want to do that they can just not respond to my comments… It’s not like I’m spamming posts or attacking people. I don’t understand how I deserve to be banned for that.
I did ask myself. I don’t think I did anything wrong here though…
Usually I get banned for being a liberal leftist cuck or whatever the right side calls you when they disagree with your opinion or can’t handle push back on theirs…
It’s just on leftist leaning subs I get banned for being a mazi…
You think me asking if being against DEI equals to being a nazi now, should result in an immidiately ban? Is that really crossing some line?
Try one of their lines and I’ll refute it in 2 sentences…
None of what you said is a good argument for censorship in my opinion.
Why is now not the time? If it’s now a lot of them comes out the woodwork it’s now you have a chance to change their mind or at least argue the other side so they hear opinions that doesn’t align 100% with their own.
A good example from some influencers recently is asmongold and hasanabi.
Asmon had some opinions about Israel/Palestine that were pretty aggressive. Instead of ignoring him Hassan had a multiple hour long conversation with him and at least to a degree, managed to change asmongolds stance.
Had he just said “nah I don’t talk to people with that opinion” , nothing would have changed…
I never said to tolerate them or not let them know why their ideology is fucked up.
The problem with your statement or at least how other people act on those same thoughts is that the cut off for when someone is a nazi becomes less and less.
I was called a nazi sympathiser and banned from a sub lemm.ee for asking if being against DEI equals being a nazi now.
Nobody wanted to even discuss it. They just assume the very worst of you, call you a nazi and then ban you.
That’s how you end up with echo chambers.
I just don’t understand why it’s a problem that the nazis come out. Would we not rather they utter their opinions in the open so they can be refuted? That way people can also just ignore that user if they don’t like viewing what he has to say.
It’s not like they don’t exist just because we ban them here… They’ll go somewhere to discuss where only other people who agree with them is allowed to be.
Unless we’re talking direct threats or doxing I’m always an advocate for free speech online.
Found a massive pine cone in Rome when I visited about 24 years ago.
Not really sure why I kept it but I did.
Do peoplr realize that whenever a north Korean speaks, even though you can’t see it, they have a gun to their head and the heads of all their family members…?
I’d take everything he says with a big grain of salt.
It seems like some distros have HDR working on most things.
I’ve been wanting to move from windows to Linux for about 10 years now but there’s always been something that Linux just didn’t do that stopped me.
I look into it every few years and now it seems like the only thing missing is the last few HDR hickups.
For a long time my issue with moving was that there was nothing on Linux that could compare to madvr. It seems like mpv is getting close.
Hopefully it’ll all get done before the support for windows 10 ends.
If video/audio playback and HDR is completely fixed before then I believe a lot of people will move to Linux rather than Windows 11.
Do you use a monitor with hdr and if so have you experienced issues with that?
That’s not obvious at all…
Maybe it is to people who are really deep into the Linux world but generally if there’s only a single person in the world doing something, it’s never obvious that someone else will start to do that if the first person stops.