Seconded, I use a Define 7 and it’s fantastic. Best big black box I’ve ever owned.
Seconded, I use a Define 7 and it’s fantastic. Best big black box I’ve ever owned.
Have you checked out United Allergy Services? They claim to have self-administered allergy shots.
It’s 100% worth it. Not only does it get rid of the pollution, it tastes a lot better too.
So Google Search, even back in 2000, was an AI?
I’m of Sicilian heritage and Cash’s first wife, Vivian Liberto, would look perfectly at home at a family reunion.
Yeah, he’s the classic boomer model of “my point is whatever makes me correct at this immediate moment”. Check his comment history for a laugh, he gives people grief for doing the same things he’s doing here. No self awareness or integrity whatsoever.
What’s funny is how you call someone a coward elsewhere for doing the same. I guess it takes one to know one.
That’s a lot of deflection when you could have just said “I am unable to address anything you wrote” and saved so much time.
I don’t think you understand what anecdotal evidence means. One person seeing something repeatedly is still anecdotal and of similarly little value when making statements about broader trends.
You didn’t link or even reference this media coverage that specifically supports your assertion so yes, for your comment and even this one, the observation is still solely yours. We’re not mind readers, we don’t know what you’re not telling us and, in case you ask, no, we’re not going to look it up for you. If you don’t provide evidence, people online generally assume you’re making it up, and rightfully so.
A boomer thinks their anecdotal experience is indicative of anything beyond their own experience? Shocking.
/s
Grandpa, I think you got lost on your way to Facebook.
Props to the guy who asks if Al Qaeda is woke. These two have to be some of the dumbest people alive.
Watch out, language like that will have idiots ripping out their network adapters next.
It’s really refreshing. We do have our share of crazies, as my block list can attest, but for the most part people are willing to accept that sometimes situations can be really complicated.
Sold by Nrnrnrg, a small “Ukrainian”* family owned company trusted for generations, established last week!
*designed in the Ukraine but assembled and shipped by our “trusted Chinese partners”**.
** partnership also first formed last week, sight unseen.
Is the person stealing food rich? If so, then no one is going to jail.
I drive a Prius and can confirm. Large trucks act threatened by my existence on a regular basis.
You’ve got to be kidding.
Tl;dr: imagine the success and continuity of not only your career but the careers of your employees had a significant element of random chance involved. Welcome to research.
Now former scientist here. I see the typical “people would do this anyways” comments but I’d wager they don’t understand what it’s like to work in science and academia. It’s publish or perish. In the United States, it’s an absolute capitalist meat grinder and it can be brutal.
As a lead researcher, you are dependent on securing grant money not only to keep your job, but to keep the jobs of your co-workers and the very lab itself afloat.
How do you secure grants? By showing you have the experience and ability to complete the research.
How do you show you have the required experience and ability? By your lab’s record of publishing the results of successful research.
What is successful research? In an ideal world, it would be what was found at the end of an investigation, regardless of if it disproves the null hypothesis or not. In reality, it’s the results of research that have further application, either in industry or that disprove the null hypothesis and act as a step to get you further related grants.
What happens when an investigation flounders? So you didn’t disprove the null hypothesis. In an ideal world, you publish a paper explaining what happened and everyone knows what not to do in the future. In reality, it’s basically unpublishable as journals want what will make them money. Your lab now has the research equivalent of a gap in your resume. You continue with other research and hope it is publishable. If your lab has a streak of bad luck and multiple projects crap out, now it’s harder to secure grants. The downward spiral begins.
Is what this researcher did wrong? Absolutely, but I get it. I 100% get it.
We need serious reform that removes the profit motive. A functional research system would better catch fabricated results before they’re published. It would alleviate the pressures that drive good people to do bad things in the pursuit of doing further good. It would actually enhance scientific discovery as ALL results would be published and without parasitic publishers as unnecessary middlemen.