deleted by creator
deleted by creator
No Giannis means this could be a rough one
And the signature move of statists like you is to come into communities about libertarianism just to troll and disgorge verbal diarrhea of a statist nature.
It’s all the statist uniparty. There is no difference
They’ve been working on a cloud backup feature, which might enable this.
Session eliminated perfect forward secrecy. Big no for those who take encryption seriously.
I’m perfectly calm and at no point have I engaged in name calling. As for the redirects, nobody is required to take those. Those who want to engage in the discussion more may choose to follow the link, and others will not. No one- or two-sentence description will replace reading the full article. I can’t understand how you think the prior state of the community is superior. Most posts here don’t get more than a handful of comments, be it an external article or an essay written here.
Implementing these rules would kill any chance at an active community. Things are already slow here, and the articles have actually spurred some activity. If you prefer no community to a community that doesn’t 100% follow your preferred rules, then go ahead with the plan. This post just sounds like a moderator trying to find an excuse for existence. Getting annoyed by articles that are a common prompt for discussion on many platforms and calling article posts “meaningless spam” is ridiculous.
Bad idea. While there is a place for longer-form posts, news articles are valuable as well. Articles can inspire good discussion, just like longer posts can. Fewer people have time to write longer posts, and this community was quite inactive until people started posting news articles.
Libertarians believe that the compensation you earn is what the market dictates given productivity and other economic conditions. Terms like “honest pay” and “living wage” are meaningless and have no place in a serious conversation about economics.
You don’t sound very libertarian to me.
The new scheme puts Brook in a spot that is a bad fit for him. He was a DPOY contender because he thrives in drop coverage. Griffin is moving away from that, it seems, so it will be very interesting to see where they end up.
They do not at this time intend to drop the phone number requirement, as they see it as an anti-spam measure. Meredith Whittaker has said as much. Phone number privacy is a project independent of requiring phone number at signup, and it just prevents other users from seeing your number.
Usernames have not been released yet. When they are released, phone number will still be required for registration, but you will be able to hide it from other people on Signal.
“Libertarian” is an umbrella term which can describe many anarchists as well as statists. Again, one of the most popular libertarians is Murray Rothbard, who was an anarcho-capitalist.
This hardline distinction that you’re drawing between libertarians and anarchists is ridiculous and not rooted in reality. Many libertarians are and have been anarchists. Murray Rothbard and Lysander Spooner are two well-known examples.
This is the answer. We Bucks fans all expected this.
He was forced to do more on offense this year because of Middleton’s absence. I don’t think it’s crazy to think his efficiency will return next season. Hopefully he’s working on some stuff in Greece, maybe a post game.
What about full passwordless login?