Then it would be true, but in the context it sounded like preamble to lesserevilism genocide (which that person is also doing completely openly so it’s supported assumption).
Then it would be true, but in the context it sounded like preamble to lesserevilism genocide (which that person is also doing completely openly so it’s supported assumption).
ALL CAREER POLITICIANS ARE “GENOCIDERS” from what I have seen so far in my life on this planet.
That’s right.
Why are you even agreeing with him here? Last when i check overwhelming most of coutries, parties and politicians “on this planet” do not commit genocide.
Hezbollah confirmed it, he’s really dead.
Yes, it was upgrade of khopesh.
Yeah that’s literally 2 clicks from the basest of searches:
(Hokien, Hakka, Matsu and Wuqiu are some of very many southern languages of Chinese, and Formosan is the Austronesian group of languages spoken by indingenous population)
Because they are sucked to the same boot.
It was probably inspired by Egyptian khopesh since it was used in Ethiopia even before the kingdom of Axum. Thing is, the blade is sharp on both sides. So you could either use its inner side as big sickle to reach around enemy shield and try for the weak spots like neck, face or armpits, or if the enemy didn’t had a shield you could turn it to outer side and in this case it was similar to Persian shamshir in being excellent weapon against unarmored opponents.
Two more interesting thing about it was 1: the designs varies greatly, most were shorter and wider, the curvature also varied; and 2: it apparently worked quite well considering it has been in use for possibly over 2500 years and some Ethiopian emperors even organised special elite units wielding it.
It do looks longer than it is because of proportions. It’s very thin and the handle is pretty short compared to European blades because the blade is also very light so it don’t need much counterweight.
I imagine Russia would
Start a hot war against USA in the central Atlantic? Pentagon would go ballistic, as in “ballistic missiles”, and even if the war stayed conventional, Russian navy would be in a huge disadvantage there.
Sword but very curved and yet not very famous (Ethiopian shotel)
During the Cold War there was a chance USSR would intervene. Who would intervene right now?
37 people didn’t
They can also use their navy to make a full blockade.
deleted by creator
Dems? None, but Trump could get some lazy rep hawks to vote harping on how dems are incompetent at imperialism and he would be better. After all elections in US are usually decided not by % of supporters but who mobilises their voters better to move their butts to booth.
I mean Ukraine “victory” plan is, depending on version, either: a) The same as usual, that is unconditional surrender of Russia, which obviously won’t happen; b) Ostensibly the same but aimed at excusing themselves before the west from starting the actual peace negotiations; c) Manufacturing conditions for open NATO intervention
None of those is something that would impress US, but they will likely go with a) because collapse right now would be a political bomb and after elections it would be something entirely different regardless of who wins (like Afghanistan proven, nobody in US even remember that rout now).
America can’t stop tons of drugs and weapons getting delivered into America every day
As if they even want to. War on Drugs is very effective method of controlling population (and was engineered by Nixon administration first) and padding the prison slavery. Also, as affairs like Iran-Contras proven, letters are deep in this.
He’s trying for the peace-nobel winning 12 wars of Obama.