True… but that sounds nowhere near as funny 🤣
True… but that sounds nowhere near as funny 🤣
deleted by creator
I feel like that sentence is one that needs punctuation.
Where’s my boy, beef stroganoff
Where’s my boy-beef, stroganoff
I dunno what the latter even is, but it seems very different than the former!?
Edit: this message got duplicated somehow so I deleted the other one.
Profits > … everything, actually.
How quickly we forget the lessons that Battlestar Galactica tried to instill in us… :-D
Far less than on Reddit, but it still affects someone’s experiences. e.g. just bc someone does not experience something daily does not mean that it never happens, but often a person in a minority status group has no choice to ignore such, while the privileged status person can.
Or dinner, depending on your politics I suppose… 😜
Yup, that was it!
ƃuᴉuǝuɐǝq ǝɥ┴
It can be, depending on your level of imagination… and skill.:-)
Hence why the mirrored version definitely does not represent a “natural” storm.
Alternatively, they are homeless and have to keep moving to avoid the coppas. 🐦➡️👮
I thought jeans were scheduled next tho?
That’s the idea. Right now most mainstream audiences seem to prefer X to moving away from that, but it sure would be nice to have alternative options. Such as Mbin that will check both Mastodon and Lemmy instances.
Exactly that. Which ironically doesn’t mean that everything that they say is false… but it does mean that everything that they say is suspect.
We need a billionaire to swoop in an save us. Which won’t happen, so we need a grass roots effort from the ground up to save us. Which won’t happen so we need a spaghett monster or god to save us. Which won’t happen bc e.g. the Christian God allows free will hence consequences… so we need aliens to save us. Which won’t happen bc they do not exist - that we can demonstrate.
It is a lot easier to destroy than to create, and it will require enormous efforts to maintain constant vigilance to know things in the future, in this our mis- and worse yet dis-information era.
Rules for Rulers
The rulers change, but the rules do not.
Ho ho ho, okay then! (But not me in reverse - I don’t think I want to know!?:-P)
For-profit media sells whatever makes them the highest profits. (Those who won’t, make way to those who will, or remain in obscurity e.g. how many people have even heard of Ian Danskin of Innuendo Studios.)
They will sell anything it seems, with little to no regard for facts. Then they leave it to you to determine the lies of omission, while hunting for the real truth, i.e. to do the true work of journalism. But usually unpaid, painstakingly, and again you’ll never be able to share that message by virtue of being in conflict with the for-profit sources. Or if you do, who would even understand you, especially among the sheeple who either cannot and/or also will not bother to read anything at all.
Some people like Jon Stewart have railed against this for decades… but he lost, and it’s worse than ever before. Adjust your expectations accordingly. This is the world.
One does not normally think of those words appearing together, like “accurate” and “AI”. :-)