I don’t go to parties. I sit at home and argue with internet people about words. Just like you.
I don’t go to parties. I sit at home and argue with internet people about words. Just like you.
Or how you accidentally steal someone’s cat…
You confused the word casual and causal, got corrected on your mistake, doubled down anyway, and proceeded to get pulled into a stupid Internet argument about it.
Casually incorrect about causality.
I’m not entirely clear if you are just reading causal as casual or if you’re trying to say that a causal connection can be indirectly related.
So you’re telling me if I stop breathing I’ll never get older? I’m in!
So… nihilism?
I think you’ve read more into it than the Nazis have (as they are typically too dumb to read). Things are very black and white for these people. “Immigrants is bad. Springfield is immigrants. Springfield is bad.” That’s as far as the thinking goes. Then lazy Neo-Nazis that have nothing to do with the situation do whatever they can to “hurt” the “bad people” and a very easy way to do that is to call in bomb threats. And since they are not just stupid but also unoriginal and they already heard someone else called in a bomb threat…I guess that’s what we’re doing now…
Same energy:
This is what Ilya saw…
The Report of the Committee Appointed by the Royal Society to Consider of the Best Method of Adjusting the Fixed Points of Thermometers; And of the Precautions Necessary to Be Used in Making Experiments with Those Instruments
Seems fancy and legit, I see no reason to actually read it and confirm the info.
I like this version better than “he had a fever when he measured 100 degrees” so I will choose to believe it without further research.
I hope you are correct.
As long as they don’t fuck it up in a similar fashion to seemingly every other thing they have tried for a couple decades.
I largely agree. Whether or not something “is art” is almost entirely subjective. But I can literally tell an LMM to “make an art” without any actual direction and it will make something. Does that make it less a work of art? It kind of feels like it to me. But if I ask that 50 times and then pick the one I like best, does that change it’s artistic ‘value’? I can collect a pile of rocks I think look cool and the collection could certainly be considered artistic, and collages are a thing, so there is certainly a lot of gray area there.
I like to think of art as more an activity that an object. If I experience it and it makes me feel things, it is art. If I create something based on my internal feelings, it is art. Maybe art is just the feelings we generate along the way?
Assuming it takes its answer from search results, and the search results are all affiliate marketing sites that just want you to click on a link and buy something, this makes perfect sense.
Your interpretation of what is art is based on the perspective of the viewer. The article seems to be defining it more in the context of the creating and the intentions/choices behind the creation. Both are valid.
If AI generated images are art, then a naturally occurring crystal cave that elicits a sense of awe is also art. Maybe that’s true, I just think it has more to do with how you define art than some objective reality of what is ‘art’.
I think that really depends how you define art…which I think is the point of the article.
Not quite an answer, but:
Vance, confusingly, proposed two vice presidential debates as opposed to the traditional one. One of his proposed dates is the same day Trump is due to be sentenced for his hush-money trial.
Imagine having to make up an entire series of math lectures just to cover up your search history.
His catchphrase is literally “you’re fired”. He’ll do it by tweet at 2am.
He’s still upset Zelenskyy didn’t falsify evidence about Hunter Biden for him.