Companies would rather cut their noses of in the end of a quarter, to claim a weight loss, than do something that would spell positive results for its lifetime…
Companies would rather cut their noses of in the end of a quarter, to claim a weight loss, than do something that would spell positive results for its lifetime…
And the extra costs to support a feature I never use.
I agree with you, it would legitimate the results though. Not that I believe that Reddit cares about that either.
Exactly who knows!?
But in all seriousness, considering how large the company seems to be with outsourcing and multiple internal levels of support, it sounds like a juicy target both for ransomware and industrial espionage.
And he wasn’t sure if he at all was going to publish it. I believe it was his wife who convinced him. Unfortunately people didn’t/don’t understand the point with the book, ie this is a bad thing to do.
With deep fakes all around you can’t really trust a phonecall just because you believe that you recognise the voice 😉😆
My wife is like that, she can still function (though I guess it costs her) while I’m totally knocked out by mines.
I like the malicious compliance but I find that to be a bad way to do a poll. Better would have been one comment with the text “Upvote if you want John Oliver pics, downvote if you want it to go back to normal”.
The way they did it if one group only upvote their alternative and the other also downvotes the opponent then the result isn’t representative. Or at least could be claimed not to be.
This is due to a murder that happened at an IKEA a couple of years ago. The murderer used knives from the department store.
That won’t help, you need scissors to open the packaging for knives from IKEA.
I wish, I really liked G+. My sharing is based on common interests, not relationship.
From a business standpoint I would never want to hire that accountant. If he openly talks about employees that way and being a bad customers to others he would probably also be a very bad supplier.