It’s mainly because of “perks.”
It’s mainly because of “perks.”
Librewolf
That was a great literal lol as I get ready for my day. Thanks!
And those are people who should be prosecuted, and they won’t be, because they’re in the club.
I didn’t say that.
And the world’s leaders will surely listen to the UN this time.
Apparently not. At any rate, the horse has been dead so long, all that’s left are sun-bleached bones.
I mean, at what point do we stop stating the obvious and focus on what is occulted?
Assault! Homicide! Blood for money, money!
The legal system, that is.
Yes. But God forbid anyone realizing someone can be socially left and economically right, or vice versa.
Interesting to consider. I’m betting it’s at least as much because he somehow personally profits from data sales, if even just “campaign” funding.
Lol. This is going to be interesting!
Before that, on 17 May 2011, the Israeli foreign ministry released a statement saying that “lawyers in the UK have formed a new group called UK Lawyers for Israel (UKLFI).” It since appears to have been removed from the ministry’s website. Turner told MEE: “We are an independent organisation and are not linked to the Israeli government.” Of the 2012 seminar, he said: “It was an excellent seminar, with distinguished speakers and very informative.”… UKLFI earlier this month wrote to the British government threatening legal action unless it reverses its decision to suspend 30 out of 350 arms licences to Israel. Jonathan Turner, who is still the CEO of UKLFI, publicly called the Labour government’s move a “political decision to appease members of the public who hate Israel based on misinformation and biased media coverage of the war. As such, it was a misuse of the power granted by the legislation”.
Lol. “Antisemites!”
Sounds similar to the domestic violence shelter I went to. And the counselor bring my confidentiality of something I said in private by sharing it during a group session.
That’s going to be fun in Georgia.
It urged the US, a Council of Europe observer state, to “urgently reform” the 1917 Espionage Act to exclude its application to publishers, journalists and whistleblowers who disclose classified information with the intent to raise public awareness about serious crimes.
I’m sure we’ll get right on that.
De la Cruz here.