ok.

…WHY?!

Counterexamples only go so far. What you really need is counterexamples, and an analysis of their implications, including a probability study.

In other words, well, science.

The “shining” nature of diamonds is not due to their reflective properties, it’s due to how they refract.

That would be great, but AI detection doesn’t work reliably at all.

Here’s a study https://edintegrity.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1007/s40979-023-00146-z#Sec19

this is stupid. The existence of an infinite number of universes does not at all imply they must represent infinite variability.

as far as I understand, the only way we know is that we have observed that they move slower than light, and therefore must have mass

nice

34 upvotes, just wow

big side, big number

deleted by creator

this is how I expect reasonable people to react with the type of knowledge you have, yet we have multiple well known sweeteners discovered by accident.

…about what?

Because that is a hack […] not a solution!

And that it looses data after merely a few milliseconds if left alone, that to account for that, DDR5 reads and rewrites unused data every 32ms.

♫ That’s a chargeback ♫

entirity? how? doesn’t it run at all?

technically yes, difference is one is backed by a nation state, the other is backed by a teenager…