A liberal economist would sacrifice a child to the line god every year to get a consistent 3.3 percent growth.
AuDHD danish baby-commie. A cat
A liberal economist would sacrifice a child to the line god every year to get a consistent 3.3 percent growth.
Venstre is a party from the 1800, back then they really were the left: (Classical) Liberalism. And they just continued to be Liberals, landing them on the right today.
Socialdemokratiet (A) implemented a lot of the Danish welfare system under Stauning in the '30s. But they are standard SDs, continuously retreating (as… Stalin said?[1]) and thereby landing them on the right.
Something about the parties that are not advancing (ideologically) are retreating ↩︎
Great introduction to this idiotas.
“moderate” yea right lmao, you were literally the leader of Venstre.
Also fuck A for making coalition with Venstre and Moderaterne DESPITE the left holding a majority. Proving the “social-democracy is objectively the moderate wing of fascism” right.
careerists and charlatans, who deserve only to be shot
Lenin is so based.
First picture lower left: 31°17’39.1"N 34°53’22.7"E
Second picture lower left: 31°17’49.9"N 34°53’29.9"E
You are correct, but! 87% = Nearly 90%
The gist might have been that the Russian envoy did appear at the location but wouldn’t negotiate
https://www.yahoo.com/news/die-welt-publishes-peace-deal-230752941.html
inevitably lead to a clash with other nations, which would not accept Russian tanks on their borders
When we don’t want foreign tanks on our borders, it’s good. When they don’t want it, it’s bad.
What was it?
Their illegitimate war of aggression on their border 850 KMs from their capital city
the negotiating third parties can’t get Russia to participate in a dialogue
Did my brain just make shit up or didn’t they nearly get to peace very early on1? Or are you saying that after Russia participated in a dialogue and Ukraine pulled out, they haven’t been willing to participate in any new talks?
I realised you can actually see (many of) the comments, it’s just that the entire post/comments stuff is very differently displayed in mastodon.
Do note that we are on lemmy, and lemmy doesn’t use followers/following (that’s why it’s 0), and that where_am_i actually has some 292 comments, the reason you can’t see any more has to do with federation stuff.
Yes it is. Since what the arch repos have is a script to download TB from torproject.org
Add repos for torproject/guardian project/whatever it’s called now, or use the torproject.org installer.
You’re thinking of F-Droid (on Android), at least that is what the Guardian Project repo is for.
torbrowser-launcher (found in the extra repo) simply downloads Tor Browser from torproject.org, unless you use some AUR version of Tor Browser that recompiles it, you are getting the exact same TB as you would by manually downloading it.
Becuase creepjs uses JS to figure out the userAgent, WorkerNavigator.userAgent
Trust me, I spent 3 years in the Tor community I know this shit, this thing comes up so often.
Alternatively: https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/applications/tor-browser/-/issues/41610
That would be a fail of the fingerprinting protection
It isn’t.
A properly set up TOR browser for example should not allow that detection by any means.
Yes it should, through Javascript. https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/applications/tor-browser/-/issues/26146#note_2649490
Does that work, or does it have to be @[email protected] < like this?
Just to make it clear: “our penologists” is Amerikkkan penologists.
I’m not sure, but it’s in line with what the Soviets did:
In the first place there is no prison sentence longer than ten years, and few offenders serve that long. The authorities figure that a maximum ten-year constructive program will fit anybody for proper living unless he is irredeemable. There will be some cases, of course, where there is failure, but the idea is to fit the régime to the majority. Right here there will be the question always forthcoming as to what they would do with our own gangster type. Give them a ten-year sentence? Not at all. They have few of them and for armed robbery one may be sentenced to death. No arguments are listed here for or against punishment by death, but in order to understand the absence of a long prison sentence it is necessary to be informed as to what happens to those who would ordinarily be the recipients of such a term. The fellow who murders in a jealous rage or great anger may find himself in for a long treatment in a place for mental abnormals, or he may, if judged sane, be given a sentence of ten years or less. They do not consider this type of murderer to be, usually, a further social menace.
With those disposed of the formulators of the policy believe that a longer sentence for others is not needed. They see no aid anywhere in having one languish in prison beyond that point where a sentence ceases to have the possibility of being constructive and begins to dull the senses and perspective of the prisoner so that he is worthless anywhere. Some of our penologists have said that it is better to keep a man either a brief period or for his life because after a certain time it is practically impossible for him to fit into a society of which he has no knowledge.
At least one.