![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://ani.social/pictrs/image/e6da57bc-8940-4f02-90c4-786d74ce3c32.webp)
When I was in 7th grade there was an 8th grader showing off her wedding pictures at the lunch table. She was 14, her husband was 18, and we all lived in Alabama.
When I was in 7th grade there was an 8th grader showing off her wedding pictures at the lunch table. She was 14, her husband was 18, and we all lived in Alabama.
This series deserves a top 3 spot in Jump ಠ_ʖಠ
I too am more concerned about other topics than Russia snooping my PC.
Same. I didn’t technically qualify at the time, but I had a kid hospitalized when I was about 4000 miles from home with no car, no phone, and no immediate contacts. They hooked me up with a room outside the hospital and just asked for a donation if I wanted and to keep it tidy.
So, in your opinion, did anything in the universe verifiably happened until after 1857?
On a related note, Trump attempted to set the refugee cap to Zero. Both sides are about as similar as milk and a tire.
con·vic·tion
noun
a formal declaration that someone is guilty of a criminal offense, made by the verdict of a jury or the decision of a judge in a court of law.
“she had a previous conviction for a similar offense”
I spent about a decade working with refugees and had the same experience with Pakistani people. It felt like I was in bizarro world. They’re waiting 10+ years to get to the US, and during that time Trump basically tries to ban refugee entries altogether, and they’re still like, nope Trump’s a great guy. I don’t understand the world I guess.
Seeing that it’s been explicitly stated that that’s not the case, you strike me as a dude that cares less about the meaning of words than the opportunity to argue about them.
If you read the law you posted, it doesn’t actually address the question of victimhood. Also, I don’t really get why you’re still trying to force an unrelated point into this part of the discussion. Maybe find another place in the thread where someone thinks it’s legal and go talk to them.
While true, it also wasn’t really what my post was responding to. Thanks though.
Having never used an AI generator, generic generated images wouldn’t be an actual match to the dataset images, right? It would just be generating features it understands to be associated with the concept of a child, which would make the claim that the dataset children are the abuse targets a stretch, unless there’s some other direct or indirect harm to them. An immediate exception being a person writing a prompt attempting to create a specific facsimile of an individual.
Coach Z has had it rough since the sun set on the golden age of flash animation.
It’s like he went to the Carlson school of ‘just asking questions’.
deleted by creator
When I was in college, I had a tendency to grab random series from an fserv in IRC. One day I got Kaleidostar not knowing what it was and proceeded to marathon the whole 50 something episodes. I told the homies I was in my room watching porn lest they know I’d secretly become invested in binging anime made for middle school girls.
One of my favorite things to do is pass my speech into it and have it rewrite with fog index “#”. Really helps with speaking to varied audiences about the same topic.
The phrozen sonic 12k claims it can get down to .01 mm layers. I feel like that would have a decent shot. But I could be misinterpreting what that means for resin since I’ve never used it.
I get that it’s a joke, but can anyone eli5 why this wouldn’t work with modern resin printing resolutions?
Not sure, but you’ve got a solid 50/50 on that.