I wanna be a gorilla field researcher. They’re cool. I saw a video where a wildlife photographer was following a gorilla too close, and you’re like, “that animal is fuck this guy up”, right? Nah. The gorilla punches him in the face and keeps walking.
This is a foundational model, and like many early-stage theories, it begins by proposing a new framework rather than conforming to existing ones. The “equations from thin air” are not arbitrary—they emerge from a single principle: tension (pressure differential) as the driver of emergence. This principle is explored through both simulation and recursive analysis.
The framework does not assume fundamental particles or fields—it posits emergence from imbalance itself. Pressure and tension in this context are not analogies but descriptors of system instability across recursive layers. That’s precisely why dimensionality and structure unfold as outcomes, not inputs.
As for units, I agree this needs refinement, and I’m in the process of standardizing definitions and dimensional analysis across the paper. That’s part of transitioning from raw model to publishable form.
And yes—the parameters are currently tuned manually. This is an early simulation stage. You’re right to challenge that. But early-stage models, from cosmology to climate science, begin with manual parameter fitting to find viable behaviors. The next step is automation, testing against empirical datasets, and refining the bounds of those parameters.
Thank you for your feedback. I’ll prepare a LaTeX version with full mathematical notation.
Enshittification