I’m convinced a lot of you fuckers are zionists who want trump in the WH so that Israel gets a blank cheque.

That’s a pretty dumb thing to ask someone througb the medium of text.

You just called for his execution, how can you follow that up with “promoting violence, is not the right solution”?

And what is Israel?

A true Zionist would want the result that gives Israel the most freedom to act as it wishes. Given that a trump victory would enable this, I can only assume that you yourself are a zionist.

Yeah I think that’s why Iran attacked the US base (might have been multiple, I can’t really remember) iirc.

I think a big part of why the US didn’t respond is that a) they took out Soleimani first and b) an Iranian air defence battery, on high alert expecting US retaliation, immediatley shot down a passenger jet.

The airliner being downed really took the sting out of it, kind of like someone swinging at you, barely connecting, and then immediately punching themselves in the dick.

It’s more likely that they are being sent because they are trained to operate THAAD and sending them is more efficient than training IDF troops to operate it.

Iran launched missiles at US bases in Iraq a few years ago with very little in the way of retaliation.

Operating the anti ballistic missile aystem that’s being sent.

Removed by mod

Person who posts something on the internet: “omg why would you comment”

Confidently incorrect.

Sorry for your loss mate.

And asking two people was easier than using a search engine?

That you think there would be outrage highlights your lack of understanding.

International waters are just so. It’s only a problem when a country decides to try and restrict access to international waters, and one way to show that this decision is not accepted is to sail warships through it.

You ok dude? Kinda seems like you’re just screaming into the wind here.

Can you point out the part of the geneva conventions that make using incendiary weapons against military targets in non civilian areas a war crime?

Use of incendiary weapons against military targets is not a war crime unless in an area where civilians are present.

Of course they do, it’s main use is smoke generation.

Fair enough, I can see how that might be beneficial.

Ok fair enough, I see how that would be a win.