

I believe it’s at least partially tied to Android’s architecture, for example how you need to “optimize apps” on first boot.
That there is no perfect defense. There is no protection. Being alive means being exposed; it’s the nature of life to be hazardous—it’s the stuff of living.
I believe it’s at least partially tied to Android’s architecture, for example how you need to “optimize apps” on first boot.
Snapseed is still around?
Also funny that the update is only for iOS
Very cool article (and series).
Thanks for sharing.
There are sociological methods such as list experiments that allow one to gauge preference falsification impact by comparing list experiment results to more direct polling methods.
List experiments on russian attitudes have been conducted on a wide variety of topics including support for the full-scale invasion of Ukraine, support for the annexation of Crimea (pre-fullscale invasion) and support for putin’s regime (across time).
The results are damning for russian society.
This is not a novel methodology and there is research on this approach (in context of russia) going back decades. The quantity of research is large enough to allow for meta-analysis research specifically on this topic (again with damning results for russian society).
There is also qualitative research on this topic albeit it tends to have an element of subjectivity and you generally need to to know russian to understand it. For what it’s worth, there is a recent qualitative research project around “apolitical” russians in the province that dispels the myth of “russian innocence polemics” and shows that even “apolitical” russians in the periphery are largely commited to genocidal imperialism even if they are not that outspoken about it. The funny thing was this project was run by allegedly opposition minded russians (who have a strong incentive to downplay reality).
Care to answer my question now?
I will get to that. Believe it or not, you’re not the first person on this planet to think about this. 😆
But first, please indulge me and explain how some russians being prosecuted for anti-war views is evidence that most (many) russians oppose the imperial conquest of Ukraine?
How are these two things related? It makes no logical sense.
A strong majority is somewhere between 60 to 70 percent. A regular majority is between 50+1 and 60 percent. Usage of the terms in a such a context is widely used by respectable news organizations.
How can you be so sure about your assessment when any Russians who oppose the war are made an example of by the state?
Logically, how is the prosecution of anti-war russians related to the overall support for genocidal imperialism among the russian population?
A tiny “minority within a minority” could be prosecuted, while a strong or overwhelming majority can be committed genocidal imperialists. These two points are not contradictory.
Do you have any solid sources on this or is this speculation/polemics on your part?
Bullshit.
A strong majority of russians are committed to genocidal imperialism (and this is after adjustments for preference falsification).
They are going to play around with it for a bit, but they will abandon the system once it does get 12 quadrillion MAUs in the first quarter of release.
I am still on OneUI 6.1, I have a A73. 😄
Not really looking forward to the update as everything works as I need it to.
Hopefully other people will help close out the bugs in OneUI 7 before it arrives on the A73.
Instead, the AR glasses maker finally revealed that Aura won’t be processing data on the glasses itself. It will instead use a separate, tethered, puck-like device that sits in your pocket. Like Xreal’s other products, such as its recent One Pro, the glasses have the in-built wire, though you’ll be able to disconnect from the processing device if you want to store the glasses and puck separately.
This does not seem viable.
I would say there is a silver lining to all this; it may give some drive to alternatives like peertube.
Can’t speak for the US, but in Ukraine digital IDs are very helpful. You of course don’t use them on random sites (you can’t even if you wanted to), but they are great for all sorts of services and links to other government digital services (e.g. healthcare).
Can we require all Lemmy tankies to also be required IDs to access the internet and always use their real names in social media?
Since they approve of China’s policies, they should have no problem with this, right?
Fascinating article. I thought the automated pointless commit system (basic time and date updates) to the give the illusion of activity was funny.
Thanks for sharing!
I still don’t see what the problem is with competition for employees to design identical hardware. That’s the nature of free market competition, expect in a literal as opposed to polemical sense.
You also need to prove that an employee that went with a higher salary shared information in a illegal manner. And non-compete aren’t actually legal everywhere.
In April this year, Samsung filed a patent infringement lawsuit against the BOE, claiming that the Chinese display maker has been poaching the South Korean tech giant’s employees and stealing the company’s trade secrets for micro OLED displays.
How is poaching employee illegal? If Samsung wants to keep its employees, they can pay them more.
What a bunch of lying degenerates.
You are asking for trouble if you start using a Google service outside of their mainstream, mass market offerings.
Not surprised about this. I am surprised it took them so long to move to fully contract manufacturing.
4,000 ST in Geekbench 6 is a very high score by modern standards.