A federal judge yesterday ordered the Biden administration to halt a wide range of communications with social media companies, siding with Missouri and Louisiana in a lawsuit that alleges Biden and his administration violated the First Amendment by colluding with social networks “to suppress disfavored speakers, viewpoints, and content.”

    • C4RP3_N0CT3M@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      They don’t even say the 50-60 calls they are getting are just for Ivermectin, just that they’re related to COVID. Why do you think they worded it that way, to be misleading maybe?

        • C4RP3_N0CT3M@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You’re being extremely disrespectful. I did in fact read the article, but it’s clearly a biased article with no actual measured data.

          • snipgan@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            No you didn’t. It talks about it.

            Making another claim about bias won’t help you. And still leaves the rest of what I said.

            • C4RP3_N0CT3M@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’ll not be discussing with you further. Why would I? You are literally just repeating that I didn’t read the article, and have made no claims against what I said. I think we should censor YOU since I know I read it but you keep claiming I didn’t, which could be classified as misinformation.

              • snipgan@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                Then you are admitting you are wrong and aren’t acting in good faith. The literal next section of that article mentions it.

                Just repeating yourself won’t make you right. And above all else, you haven’t proven anything today.

                • C4RP3_N0CT3M@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Firstly, you saying I’m admitting that I’m wrong is arguing in bad faith by definition, as I never said that. Quote the part of the article you’re talking about specifically, and I’ll refute that, that way I’ll be forced to read it. Also, ciritizing me for repeating myself is ironic considering you keep repeating yourself.