• hawkwind@lemmy.management
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    Alternative title: CEO of failing company makes shocking statement in order to attract investors.

    He might believe this but developers aren’t going anywhere. Development is just becoming more abstract. This has happened in fits since forever.

  • whatsarefoogee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t believe that he believes that. Sounds like attention seeking by making outrageous claims.

    Maybe he really is that stupid, but I find that unrealistic.

    • InternetPirate@lemmy.fmhy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      There are plenty of people who believe that. The date of AGI according to 700 people is 2033, so probably an AI that can code as well as humans will be ready a few years before that.

      • Lukecis@lemmy.fmhy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Tbh, as soon as GPT-5 or something as powerful Drops and it’s capable of programming its successor AGI/Sentient AI is coming nearly immediately aftwards, so I hope you guys are all onboard for the new ai overlords.

  • PaddedPerson@lemmy.fmhy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    As a software engineer who existing limited tools daily: actually programmers will definitly be gone. i do think there will be something along the lines of “llm supervisor”/ “Person who fixes bugs in llm code that it cant” but such a drastically lower number of them.

    like probably for every 100 programmers now there will be a few… and it will mostly be the engineers not developers. most developers right now are given a series of bug or simple feature request tickets that LLM’s now can do the majority of the work on. i cant imageine in 5-10 years

  • Gsus4@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    If that is true, that is not something to look forward to. It means that … oh ok this is c/singularity, carry on, lol

    • InternetPirate@lemmy.fmhy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Why do you assume the AI of tomorrow is going to be the same LLM of today? I don’t think AI is going to need supervising for much longer.

      • Zeth0s@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Because everything needs supervision, even the president of the United States is supervised by judges and voters.

        AI will need supervision in 5 years. Even a completely autonomous agent will need a supervisor

  • Adam@lemmy.fmhy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Will just be a New job title… Solution designer. I’m personally not afraid