Israel screens unseen Hamas bodycam footage of attack
www.bbc.com
Journalists were shown 43 minutes of raw footage from the attack but most of it will not be made public.

This article contains descriptions of violence which some readers may find distressing.

The Israeli military held a screening for journalists on Monday of raw footage recovered from Hamas body cameras, in an effort to remind the world of the brutality of the attack on Israel two weeks ago.

The bodycam footage, cut together with clips from CCTV, dashboard cameras and the mobile phones of both Hamas gunmen and victims, showed in stark detail the sheer horror visited on a music festival and family neighbourhoods in southern Israel.

The Israeli military also released documents which they said were recovered from dead Hamas members, containing detailed operational planning and instructions for attacking the neighbourhoods and taking hostages.

The 43 minutes of footage screened in Tel Aviv on Monday was distilled from hundreds of hours of footage collected since the attack, the Israeli military said. It contained clips of Hamas gunmen cheering with apparent joy as they shot civilians on the road, and later stalking the pathways of kibbutzim and killing parents and children in their homes.

  • paintbucketholder@lemmy.worldEnglish
    317·
    1 year ago

    I know you’re citing the United Nations as an authority, and providing a link is definitely welcome, but the site you’re linking literally says

    The number of people killed in Gaza has reached 5,087 according to latest reports from de facto authorities there

    thereby acknowledging that even the UN is merely repeating the numbers that Hamas is giving them.

    Could we maybe agree that blindly accepting whatever Hamas is saying as truth is not the best policy?

    • jordanlund@lemmy.worldMEnglish
      1210·
      1 year ago

      If the number is good enough for the U.N., it’s good enough for me. I’m in no position to “Um, aCKtUaLly…” the United Nations. ;)

      If they felt it was wrong or biased they wouldn’t cite it.

      • 520@kbin.social
        97·
        1 year ago

        They themselves imply the number is likely to be biased (the defacto authority is hardly going to be impartial), but I agree, it isn’t your job to second guess the numbers being used by the UN.

        • ???@lemmy.worldEnglish
          13·
          11 months ago

          No, I mean you were wrong 😊 let me know when you need more reading comprehension help

            • ???@lemmy.worldEnglish
              13·
              11 months ago

              No, because the numbers were always right, because the UN and Gazan medical health centers and hospitals are reliable and have always been.

              • paintbucketholder@lemmy.worldEnglish
                11·
                11 months ago

                The numbers were reported by Hamas. The UN merely used those numbers.

                Tell me why we should put blind faith into anything published by Hamas?

                • ???@lemmy.worldEnglish
                  1·
                  11 months ago

                  Because the numbers have been vetted and counted by the UN before the war many times. Because Gaza ha(d) a good enough medical standard and was trusted by medical organizations all over the world. The only people not believing the Gazan ministry is YOU, Israel, and the US. Whst a coincidence that no one else had any reason to doubt this number… Only genocide deniers do.