That moment when you are walking down the street and you accidentally tread in a steaming pile of irony.

  • IAmWiking@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    As it says in the article, he’s been designated a PEP because he allegedly took money from the Russian government. He denies this but hasn’t sued the person making the allegation. Even in his rant on GB news he lists Ukraine first as a potential state known for bribery. He excuses Russian actions at every turn, it’s clear he’s getting something from them.

    • zero_iq@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      He denies this but hasn’t sued the person making the allegation.

      He can’t, because it was said under parliamentary privilege. An MP (in this case, Chris Bryant) cannot be sued for statements made in Parliament.

      I’m not going to defend Farage (I think he’s a slimeball) but the fact he hasn’t sued is not evidence either way.

    • tal@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      He denies this but hasn’t sued the person making the allegation

      Setting aside the issue of whether-or-not he has received money, I don’t think that it’s a great idea to make the expected norm for someone to sue someone else if they’re innocent of something that someone claims that they did. Kind of results in everyone running around with lawyers on hair-trigger.

      • Anomandaris@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Between normal people, or even minor celebrities, I would absolutely agree. But Farage is a notable entity in politics and journalism, one would hope that being accused of corruption, bribery, and treason would be ruinous for such a career. That is absolutely the sort of thing you would sue over, if you believed you had a good chance at winning.