Context: PugJesus often spams low quality posts across the dozen or so communities they mod, apparently downvoting low effort spam on my frontpage is trolling. The only other action in the modlog is a different ban for 74 years for “Mass downvoting innocuous content,” so it definitely seems they are just banning people that dislike their spam. Glad we’re not missing out on the reddit mod experience here.
ahaha you did think that
personally?
Wow you operate in such a way where you reply to people who reply to you?
It isn’t my semantics it’s the part of the language we are speaking. It’s uhm not really up for interpretation either. I think it would help if you understood that just because it is an excuse, doesn’t inherently make it wrong. What makes it an excuse it is an explanation or justification which moves responsibility from one thing to something else. That should help you.
FTFY
You didn’t apologize before I hurled descriptors at you. I mean it wouldn’t make a difference now I had to tell you that it was the right thing to do. That fact that you never thought of doing the right thing is what matters here. Actually you keep trying to double down and dismiss it rather than just bite the bullet. Hung up? Judging you based on your actions buddy.
Whether or not downvoting in bulk is “trolling” or not, or is seen as that doesn’t change that I would ban people for doing it on communities that I run. It is a descriptor that changes nothing here.
I don’t see at all why it is wrong to choose to ban a user who only interacts with your community by downvoting lots of posts.