@ernest how do I report a Magazin on kbin.social ? There is a usere called “ps” who is posting to his own “antiwoke” Magazin on kbin.social. Please remove this and dont give them a chance to etablish them self on kbin.social. When I report his stuff it will go to him because he is the moderator of the magazin? Seems like a problem. Screenshot of the “antiwoke” Magazin /sub on kbin.social. 4 Headlines are visible, 2 exampels: “Time to reject the extrem trans lobby harming our society” “How to end wokeness” #Moderation #kbin #kbin.social 📎
edit: dont feed the troll, im shure ernest will delet them all when he sees this. report and move on.
Edit 2 : Ernest responded:
“I just need a little more time. There will likely be a technical break announced tomorrow or the day after tomorrow. Along with the migration to new servers, we will be introducing new moderation tools that I am currently working on and testing (I had it planned for a bit later in my roadmap). Then, I will address your reports and handle them very seriously. I try my best to delete sensitive content, but with the current workload and ongoing relocation, it takes a lot of time. I am being extra cautious now. The regulations are quite general, and I would like to refine them together with you and do everything properly. For now, please make use of the option to block the magazine/author.”
❤
You’re all so fucking sensitive. This is nothing hateful, and you’re trying to censor it because someone doesn’t align with your political views. You want lemmy to become your next leftist echo chamber. Go to your beehaw, where everything you don’t like is censored.
“Trans people are harming our society” isn’t hateful?
Keep lickin boots, I suppose.
They’re from exploding-heads. Best to just ignore them, and don’t feed the trolls.
Hopefully we can get defederated from them eventually.
They need to be defederated now, not eventually. Letting the Nazis sit at your table only ends one way.
People are allowed to believe that trans people are harming society. They are also allowed to share those opinions. Censoring anyone for any reason is far, far worse than anything I can imagine.
deleted by creator
Go back where you came from, bigot.
deleted by creator
I don’t care about mentally ill people. You cut off your dicks and when someone told anything negative about it, you cry about it and threaten to kill yourself.
I’m not mentally ill, so I don’t have to “lick boots”. I think like that myself.
Literally nothing you said there was coherent or relevant lol, but then that’s just par for you.
user em3l0rd is from exploding-heads.com
It’s about time we start talking about defederating exploding-heads.com
lemmy.world just defederated them:
https://lemmy.world/post/694810
“Tldr: Exploding heads is a right-wing, Trump worshipping bitcoin bro instance, in addition to being a bastion of bigotry and transphobia.”
Then shouldn’t people like 10A be fine with discussion of banning their stuff? That’s literally all ‘anti woke’ bullshit is about, censoring ideas.
Reasonable people can have disagreements about trans rights.
For instance, the complexities of solving trans issues in sports, does the age of HRT matter for gendered leagues and title IX? Rule changes occur in sports leagues every year, how will acknowledging trans people change the ways we revise rules for safety, competition, entertainment, and sportsmanship? Should certain sports start to franchise into coed/nonbinary leagues?
For instance the best approach for teach children acceptance and tolerance towards peers who may come to identify with a different gender thsn assigned. There can be conservative and liberal approaches to teaching tolerance.
For instance the difference between the Human Rights campaign that wants LGBTQ civil rights to mimic POC civil rights (the capitalist conservative path, btw) versus groups that advocate liberation politics and taking civil rights in a more left wing direction.
Those are political disagreements. QAnon-fake-news trans lobby conspiracy is not a political disagreement - it’s just trolling.
Wanting to actively attack people you don’t like is not a political view, though. It’s literal violence.
Hate speech doesn’t equal free speech!
I think you have a good point, which is that Kbin and Lemmy’s position as decentralized sites should mean that most content should be allowed as a basic freedom, whether or not you agree with the subject matter. As long as we’re allowed to block it I think having mass control over the content of all instances is too far and antithetical to what decentralized sites are trying to accomplish.
That being said, if you want anyone to be on your side you can’t address them as a high roading asshole with poor tone. I’d hope we can leave the combative argumentative mindset of reddit behind and just try to communicate with people.