@ernest how do I report a Magazin on kbin.social ? There is a usere called “ps” who is posting to his own “antiwoke” Magazin on kbin.social. Please remove this and dont give them a chance to etablish them self on kbin.social. When I report his stuff it will go to him because he is the moderator of the magazin? Seems like a problem. Screenshot of the “antiwoke” Magazin /sub on kbin.social. 4 Headlines are visible, 2 exampels: “Time to reject the extrem trans lobby harming our society” “How to end wokeness” #Moderation #kbin #kbin.social 📎

edit: dont feed the troll, im shure ernest will delet them all when he sees this. report and move on.

Edit 2 : Ernest responded:
“I just need a little more time. There will likely be a technical break announced tomorrow or the day after tomorrow. Along with the migration to new servers, we will be introducing new moderation tools that I am currently working on and testing (I had it planned for a bit later in my roadmap). Then, I will address your reports and handle them very seriously. I try my best to delete sensitive content, but with the current workload and ongoing relocation, it takes a lot of time. I am being extra cautious now. The regulations are quite general, and I would like to refine them together with you and do everything properly. For now, please make use of the option to block the magazine/author.”

  • wahming@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    1 year ago

    Respectful Behavior

    We expect all users to treat each other with respect and kindness. Harassment, hate speech, or any other form of harmful behavior will not be tolerated. We reserve the right to remove any content or user that violates these guidelines.

    Isn’t this standard for anywhere that doesn’t want to end up as T_D or 4chan?

      • AnonTwo@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        35
        ·
        1 year ago

        Incidentally the person breaking the rules is making the biggest stir in this thread about not banning people.

        Guy literally is advocating beating people to death as a good Christian moral while also trying to advocate he shouldn’t be banned for it.

        • 10A@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          No, I did not advocate for beating people to death, and I would never advocate for that. Try reading the whole post and not taking a few words out of context.

          • AnonTwo@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            1 year ago

            The whole post was even more disgusting. Others are welcome to read it, Static linked it, but I stand by what I said.

            If the devil did exist, he resides in your church, raising monsters.

          • jonion@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            And these are the people who would lecture about prejudice… Nothing but prejudicial bad faith in this entire thread.

            Being a filthy reactionary, I was really hoping that the fediverse could become something like the reddit of 10 years ago, but it seems like the dyed-in-the-wool redditors couldn’t help but bring their intolerance with them.

            Thank you for actually bothering to stand your ground. God bless.

        • czech@faux.moe
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          They will always advocate for blocking over banning because they can easily make new accounts to spread their hateful message. To block a user you must first read their message; their mission is accomplished.

          Should the community have to continually deal with this baggage so that hateful people can intentionally misinterpret what “free speech” means?

      • wahming@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        they are hate magnets.

        And they were posted with the intent to be so. That suffices in my opinion. It’s not the lone post itself, but the context of the magazine as a whole.

        If the moderator refuses to properly moderate the comments

        Yes, the mod of antiwoke is about to exercise proper judgement