- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/36106116
[…]
According to the measures, introduced by the Ministry of Public Security (MPS), each internet user in China will be issued with a unique “web number,” or wanghao (网号), that is linked to their personal information. While these IDs are, according to the MPS notice, to be issued on a strictly voluntary basis through public service platforms, the government appears to have been working on this system for quite some time — and state media are strongly promoting it as a means of guaranteeing personal “information security” (信息安全). With big plans afoot for how these IDs will be deployed, one obvious question is whether these measures will remain voluntary.
[…]
The measures bring China one step closer to centralized control over how Chinese citizens access the internet. The Cybersecurity Law of 2017 merely stipulated that when registering an account on, say, social media, netizens must register their “personal information” (个人信息), also called “identifying information” (身份信息). That led to uneven interpretations by private companies of what information was required. Whereas some sites merely ask for your name and phone number, others also ask for your ID number — while still others, like Huawei’s cloud software, want your facial biometrics on top of it.
[…]
Beyond the key question of personal data security, there is the risk that the cyber ID system could work as an internet kill switch on each and every citizen. It might grant the central government the power to bar citizens from accessing the internet, simply by blocking their cyber ID. “The real purpose is to control people’s behavior on the Internet,” Lao Dongyan cautioned last year.
[…]
Take a closer look at state media coverage of the evolving cyber ID system and the expansion of its application seems a foregone conclusion — even extending to the offline world. Coverage by CCTV reported last month that it would make ID verification easier in many contexts. “In the future, it can be used in all the places where you need to show your ID card,” a professor at Tsinghua’s AI Institute said of the cyber ID. Imagine using your cyber ID in the future to board the train or access the expressway.
[…]
While Chinese state media emphasize the increased ease and security cyber IDs will bring, the underlying reality is more troubling. Chinese citizens may soon find themselves dependent on government-issued digital credentials for even the most basic freedoms — online and off.
@[email protected]
Don’t worry, ‘comrade,’ there are communities here on Lemmy that are viewing China always positively and block anything that is even slightly critical of China.
Mea culpa. That post was cross-posted to the China community and I thought I was replying there.
In the Privacy community it is entirely appropriate to criticize China relentlessly. In the China community, it is not.
This is what you refuse to understand. I don’t know if you care or not, but I agree with you about China’s government. You will see that from my posts here and elsewhere.
But I also want these discussion forums to succeed. To attract new members, communities must stay on-topic and cover a variety of viewpoints about their subject.
The topic of that community is “China”. It is not the “Communist Party of China” or “privacy”.
By ignoring this, you’re stopping that community from succeeding. And it’s even worse than that: by helping to create an off-topic community frequented by a handful of members who already agree with you, you’re ensuring that you reach nobody new, that you persuade nobody with your ideas (which, again, I agree with). Your wasting everyone else’s time and your own too. It’s sad and unnecessary.
In these .ml communities, China is always good with everything banned that is even slightly criticial of Beijing. It doesn’t matter if it’s ‘China’ or ‘Privacy’ or any other topic. If you want Lemmy to ‘succeed’, just start there. Here you are already reading unbiased, independent, and high-quality sources.