• NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Right, ok, so the problem with having a debate on this subject is that there’s no reason for this risk to exist at all. There’s no good reason to have a .zip TLD, there was no need for it, it should not have been created and no one should use it.

    If you’re weighing pros and cons, there are exactly 0 pros. Therefore no matter how minor you think the cons are, they outweigh 0 pros by 100%.

    Also, “nothing bad has happened yet” is not a valid argument and is a terrible basis for making risk decisions.

    • Blaze (he/him)@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      I see your perspective, but is there any similar instance that is not Lemmy.zip?

      From another post

      Lemmy.world is too big  
      
      sh.itjust.works names contains "shit", which can deter users  
      
      lemmy.ca is Canadian-centric  
      
      feddit.org, is German-centric, but technically English speaking too  
      
      dbzer0 is topic focused  
      
      programming.dev is topic-centric  
      
      blahaj is queer-focused  
      
      discuss.tchncs.de has a difficult name  
      
      lemmy.sdf.org does not defederate anyone  
      
      beehaw defederates LW and SJW  
      
      infosec.pub is topic-centric  
      
      aussie.zone is country-centric  
      
      midwest.social is region-centric  
      

      https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/37336391?scrollToComments=true

      https://lemmyverse.net/?order=active_month

    • Jax@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      ‘This bridge is literally held together with duct tape, but it hasn’t killed anyone yet!’

      I’m with you, unecessary risk. Thank you for the explanations.