I thought FUD was a cryptobro term.

    • splinter@lemmy.world
      333·
      3 days ago

      By the same logic you would have to start a perpetual witch hunt on all instances - after all, they could be anywhere.

      HC (the instance) does not support any side of the political debate. I guess that’s intolerable.

        • splinter@lemmy.world
          424·
          3 days ago

          We do not tolerate content that a nazi would post (e.g. calls for violence, discrimination based on race, etc).

          What do you understand by “nazi”?

      • Squorlple@lemmy.worldEnglish
        282·
        3 days ago

        implying Nazis are just a “side of the political debate”

        Elsewhere in this thread, accusing the enemy of doing exactly what they are doing.

        Emphasizes to the point of nausea that they are categorically neutral and unbiased

        Twisting words, appeal to ideological principle (“intolerable”), and other bad faith arguments.

        Yep, that’s a rightwing instance alright.

        • splinter@lemmy.world
          524·
          3 days ago

          A conservative community =/= the nazis. Also most of the accounts posting there are not even HC users.

          Can you show me an example of nazi content on HC?

          • Squorlple@lemmy.worldEnglish
            202·
            3 days ago

            Oh, let’s add strawmanning to that list

            Live footage of the admin trying to do damage control:

            • splinter@lemmy.world
              424·
              3 days ago

              So where’s the example of this nazi content?

              I have been known to add fuel to a fire.