• .Donuts@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    120
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I feel like this is satire, right?

    Edit: looked up the guy, can’t find his post. If anyone can find anything about this being real, they’ll be awarded some very real Lemmy silver!

    • jjagaimo@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      2 days ago

      Old ass image. Theory is it was made by the company selling the iq tests to make people talk about it and take a test themselves

      • theneverfox@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        44
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        I mean, that score supposedingly means you struggle to put together normal sentences… So I’d assume it’s satire

        • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          38
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          86 is still way above an intellectual disability, that limit is set below 70.

          An IQ of 86 is not THAT low, the percentile in the pic is right, about 1 in 6 people is below 86.

        • Enkrod@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          28
          ·
          2 days ago

          Oh goodness no, with an IQ of 86, most people wouldn’t even peg you as surprisingly stupid, maybe a bit slow. This is still very much in the “slightly below average” column. The 70s are “below average” and only below that do you get into disability territory.

          People overestimate the effect a not-even-20-points deviation has in real life. Just like people with an IQ of 114 are a just your average Janes and aren’t generally geniuses, people with 86 are still your average Joes and generally not noticeable. 82,2% of all people are between 80 and 120. And you can’t tell me that you actually think of every fifth to sixth person around you as exceptional (in either direction).

        • Marte@lemmy.eco.br
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          2 days ago

          86 is not that noticeable, as others have pointed out. Also, there’s a high chance this post was GPT-produced

        • RobotZap10000@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          Can you really be sure that he actually wrote something himself in 2025? Something that wasn’t a prompt?

      • .Donuts@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        !lemmysilver

        Good call using Bing cache! I can see the same post but with different numbers like you mention. So perhaps this is simply an altered image to make it more funny, instead of satire.