This should be illegal, companies should be forced to open-source games (or at least provide the code to people who bought it) if they decide to discontinue it, so people can preserve it on their own.

  • pikmeir@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    You’re referring to a video codec degrading as it keeps rendering the video again, not just copying and pasting the bits. There is no degradation from copying and pasting a file as-is.

    • doctorcrimson@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      No, I am not referring to that. YouTubers have the option to download their own videos. Not steal it with a video downloading tool.

        • doctorcrimson@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          And when you download the processed video and reupload it, it’s a 1 to 1 conversion of the same video codec, and every generation it gets worse. That example is a low hanging fruit, but the concept applies to everything.

          • pikmeir@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            No, this is because YouTube compresses every file before distributing it. This happens even when downloading on the creator side.

            • doctorcrimson@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Literally every file distribution method compresses the media first. A better argument was that YouTube re-encodes the video during the re-upload with a particularly lossy method to save on bandwidth and server space.

          • bitwolf@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            That 1:1 conversion through the same codec is very likely lossy. However that’s not a straight file copy which is what you originally said causes degradation.

            • doctorcrimson@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              You really jumped in here to tell me exactly the contents of a comment I made just below it in the thread, as if I didn’t already know it.

              • bitwolf@lemmy.one
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I jumped in to point out the flaw in the YouTube experiment you’re referring to.

                  • bitwolf@lemmy.one
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Imo, an easy way to remove YouTube’s postprocessing from the equation would be to copy a video file to and from a nas or other computer several times and compare it with the untouched file.