Blaze@feddit.nl to Buy European@feddit.ukEnglish · edit-28 days agoFinally, a Linux laptop with a brilliant display and performance that rivals my MacBook - Tuxedo (German)www.zdnet.comexternal-linkmessage-square20fedilinkarrow-up191arrow-down15cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up186arrow-down1external-linkFinally, a Linux laptop with a brilliant display and performance that rivals my MacBook - Tuxedo (German)www.zdnet.comBlaze@feddit.nl to Buy European@feddit.ukEnglish · edit-28 days agomessage-square20fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareJrockwar@feddit.uklinkfedilinkarrow-up12·edit-27 days ago As far as the display, it’s beautiful. Coming from someone who sees no problem in downscaling by 2.5 the resolution instead of changing dpi, this means absolutely nothing.
minus-squareChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·7 days agoActually, the ratio is 5/3 for the vertical axis and 3/2 for the horizontal one. Yes, the pixel count decreased by 2.5x but scaling factors are expressed in linear terms, not quadratic. Not to mention, ASPECT RATIO DISTORTION of 9/10 (-10%).
minus-squareJrockwar@feddit.uklinkfedilinkarrow-up2·7 days agoScaling factors for resolution are over the number of pixels, 4k isn’t called that because it has 16 times more pixels. Anyway, semantics. This comment discredits the reviewer in this sense.
Coming from someone who sees no problem in downscaling by 2.5 the resolution instead of changing dpi, this means absolutely nothing.
Actually, the ratio is 5/3 for the vertical axis and 3/2 for the horizontal one. Yes, the pixel count decreased by 2.5x but scaling factors are expressed in linear terms, not quadratic. Not to mention, ASPECT RATIO DISTORTION of 9/10 (-10%).
Scaling factors for resolution are over the number of pixels, 4k isn’t called that because it has 16 times more pixels.
Anyway, semantics. This comment discredits the reviewer in this sense.