https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/39616364?scrollToComments=true
https://lemmy.world/u/[email protected]
https://lemmy.world/modlog/?userId=1957570
Underage, you will be unbanned when you turn 18 (happy birthday in advance)
https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/39616364?scrollToComments=true
https://lemmy.world/u/[email protected]
https://lemmy.world/modlog/?userId=1957570
Underage, you will be unbanned when you turn 18 (happy birthday in advance)
What’s the liability? Tiktok and faceberg permits teenagers to use their websites and nothing ever happened to them.
A little bit of a late response, but the difference is that tiktok and facebook have a legal team, which we do not. One lawsuit and we would basically be toast.
https://apnews.com/article/facebook-instagram-meta-european-union-digital-services-act-61653e20757e75671092fb746e41ed4b
https://edition.cnn.com/2023/09/15/tech/tiktok-fine-europe-children/index.html
It’s the reason zucc and co want to destroy europe.
Are you suggesting that Lemmy instances are engaged in behaviour like this?
Do you have evidence?
There’s porn and violence and other adult content on Lemmy instances.
You gotta follow the law of your target countries or youll end up in the dark net.
The links were to disprove your claim nobody is holding them accountable.
So nothing then…
Everyone follows the law… How is permitting a teenager to use a public message board violates the law?
You wann do business in a country, you got to follow its laws. Easy as is.
Heres an example of such law.
https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/juschg/BJNR273000002.html
Hate voting me doesnt change facts, it just makes you look ignorant.
What does the law say?
Im not your personal translator.
You provided German text to support your argument during a discussion conducted in English
I am trying to determine if there is any validity to your argument but it appears that you are also talking out of your ass with the “law” talking point.
I have done this exercise several times here on this topic and your side has yet to provide anything to support the position beyond broad appeal to authority. Which is at best a bootlicker argument.
Like there is in movies, TV, art, history, and other websites.