Not Chad McTruth@lemmy.world to Ye Power Trippin' Bastards@lemmy.dbzer0.com · edit-222 days agoseriouslylemmy.worldexternal-linkmessage-square13fedilinkarrow-up19arrow-down115file-text
arrow-up1-6arrow-down1external-linkseriouslylemmy.worldNot Chad McTruth@lemmy.world to Ye Power Trippin' Bastards@lemmy.dbzer0.com · edit-222 days agomessage-square13fedilinkfile-text
minus-squarelemonmelon@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down1·22 days agoAre we at the point of defending clumsy, hamfisted attempts at satire just because they’re meant to be satire?
minus-squareUnruffled [he/him]@lemmy.dbzer0.comMlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·20 days agoUnless there’s a rule against “bad” satire (which is very subjective), then it probably shouldn’t be treated any differently than “good” satire.
minus-squareNot Chad McTruth@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down3·edit-222 days agohes not defending the satire shown in the post in the screenshot because obviously that one is bad
Are we at the point of defending clumsy, hamfisted attempts at satire just because they’re meant to be satire?
Unless there’s a rule against “bad” satire (which is very subjective), then it probably shouldn’t be treated any differently than “good” satire.
hes not defending the satire shown in the post in the screenshot because obviously that one is bad