Unruffled [he/him]@lemmy.dbzer0.comM to Lefty Memes@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 2 days agoMeritocracy of Serving Capitallemmy.worldimagemessage-square49fedilinkarrow-up1588arrow-down18file-text
arrow-up1580arrow-down1imageMeritocracy of Serving Capitallemmy.worldUnruffled [he/him]@lemmy.dbzer0.comM to Lefty Memes@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square49fedilinkfile-text
minus-squaredustyb0tt0mz@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·16 hours agoincorrect. science is a method to measure reality and come to conclusions based on fact. it has no bias.
minus-squareChakravantilinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·13 hours agoNo, not as you say but as he does, yes. Science was funded and motivated in the supply for such. Doesn’t matter how much science was done or by whom. Ask the Crow. Your being correct in your statement doesn’t counter his.
minus-squaresatans_methpipe@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·13 hours agoI was being smarmy. Science attracts funding and public interest when it’s used to manufacture war materials (munitions, guidance, etc.)
minus-squareSauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·9 hours agoUnder capitalism, yes. Capitalism severely undervalues anything that is not immediately exploitable by rich assholes.
incorrect. science is a method to measure reality and come to conclusions based on fact. it has no bias.
No, not as you say but as he does, yes. Science was funded and motivated in the supply for such. Doesn’t matter how much science was done or by whom. Ask the Crow.
Your being correct in your statement doesn’t counter his.
I was being smarmy. Science attracts funding and public interest when it’s used to manufacture war materials (munitions, guidance, etc.)
Under capitalism, yes. Capitalism severely undervalues anything that is not immediately exploitable by rich assholes.