This article is the best answer to people who say that they have “nothing to hide”.

China’s Communist Party is stepping up the use of big data to predict people’s behavior in a bid to identify “social risks” and prevent violent attacks on members of the public in the wake of the car killings in Zhuhai earlier this month.

  • m_f@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    28 days ago

    I wonder if there’s any crossover between the privacy and tankie parts of Lemmy. To me, this is obviously taking advantage of people’s fear to force in authoritarian measures, à la Four Horsemen of the Infocalypse. I mostly wonder because I was just talking about China on Lemmy, saying that they’re not any better than any other country, even if you ignore propaganda/Sinophobia/whatever. Moves like this make that argument obviously true to me.

    • lad@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      28 days ago

      To be an advocate for the devil here, I’d say that it’s a compelling goal to build a safer environment by leveraging technology. My view is that the problem is it usually gets used for other goals like personal power, wealth, influence, removing competitors, etc

      • m_f@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        28 days ago

        Totally. Even if you have good intentions, it will be abused at some point, either by you or someone else with bad intentions.

  • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    28 days ago

    Kung Hsiang-sheng, associate researcher at Taiwan’s Institute for National Defense and Security Research, said such systems are extremely hard to implement in real life, however.

    “Internet censors already filter and delete politically sensitive posts, but they have little ability to monitor happenings on the ground,” Kung said.

    “The only way they would be able to prevent and detect such crimes is if the person announced they were planning to kill people in a school or on the street in advance, say in an online forum,” he said.

    He said there is unlikely to be much prior warning of such crimes online.

    “They can’t investigate anyone who sounds disgruntled on the internet,” Kung said. “It’s much harder to use technology to prevent crimes … that are carried out with no prior online warning.”

    It sounds like they don’t actually have a Minority Report style prediction system that would work here, despite all their spying. Politicians like to say they have the solution to preventing violence even where effective solutions don’t exist.