I feel like this is probably pretty effective. I feel like it should be a thing.

  • Gamma@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 hours ago

    They were likely telling you to go off because the not all men argument is unnecessary and pedantic. Obviously it’s not all men, but it’s enough of them that nobody should have to specify only the misogynists, racists, rapists, etc.

    It has always been bizarre to me that good people lump themselves in with them. You don’t have to be defensive! You can understand nuance!

    • xor@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      the post i’m replying to says “ no __ with men”… 4 times… it’s silly to pretend that means only bad men….

      there’s no nuance in that list….

      blanket blaming MEN for everything is just as stupid as men acting like “all women are ___”.

      i thought the whole trans and non-binary thing would’ve taught people that’s it’s not a genetic problem with men, but a cultural problem with toxic masculinity….

      btw, women voted…. they could’ve all voted for feminist issues and anti-gop but they didn’t…. men AND women fucked this up for women AND men… we’re aaaaaaalllll fucked because of this stupid republicult, not because of a chromosome…

      but, go ahead and waste your time with stupid projects, women love doing that!
      (not all women, obviously… you understand nuance!)