fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 17 hours agolab toysmander.xyzimagemessage-square52fedilinkarrow-up1670arrow-down111
arrow-up1659arrow-down1imagelab toysmander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 17 hours agomessage-square52fedilink
minus-squareDragon "Rider"(drag)@lemmy.nzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·8 hours agoNo, counting with fingers is bad. Count with phalanges instead. It’s more efficient
minus-squareCrazyLikeGollum@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 hour agoJust be sure to do it in binary. You gotta squeeze all of the value out of those phalanges.
minus-squareDragon "Rider"(drag)@lemmy.nzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·33 minutes agoThat’s impossible, because it would require tracking each digit at once. Counting in binary is kind of possible with fingers, but not with phalanges.
No, counting with fingers is bad. Count with phalanges instead. It’s more efficient
Just be sure to do it in binary. You gotta squeeze all of the value out of those phalanges.
That’s impossible, because it would require tracking each digit at once. Counting in binary is kind of possible with fingers, but not with phalanges.