- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
Pure walled-garden behavior from the Minetest devs.
You must log in or register to comment.
The feature request includes the phrase “Behind the scenes there would need to be some cryptographic magic,” because it’s just yet another “I have a sweet idea for an app, bro, I just need you to do the coding for me” pitch.
The project has 766 contributors with pull requests being accepted all the time. That’s not a walled garden.
What I meant by “walled garden” is about federation and not commits, like look at the Signal app federation situation, they rejeted it because it might be confused with cyptocurrency, which I did hate because of its volatility
Alternative idea … Someone uses OpenConext to provide a federation hub connecting minetest servers with identity providers. You can even call it LuantiID.
I don’t see how this is such a big issue. Would feel weird to not be able to change username per server. Sometimes as my name for playing with friends or a pseudonyme if playing with strangers?
