Millennials are about to be crushed by all the junk their parents accumulated.

Every time Dale Sperling’s mother pops by for her weekly visit, she brings with her a possession she wants to pass on. To Sperling, the drop-offs make it feel as if her mom is “dumping her house into my house.” The most recent offload attempt was a collection of silver platters, which Sperling declined.

“Who has time to use silver? You have to actually polish it,” she told me. “I’m like, ‘Mom, I would really love to take it, but what am I going to do with it?’ So she’s dejected. She puts it back in her car.”

Sperling’s conundrum is familiar to many people with parents facing down their golden years: After they’ve acquired things for decades, eventually, those things have to go. As the saying goes, you can’t take it with you. Many millennials, Gen Xers, and Gen Zers are now facing the question of what to do with their parents’ and grandparents’ possessions as their loved ones downsize or die. Some boomers are even still managing the process with their parents. The process can be arduous, overwhelming, and painful. It’s tough to look your mom in the eye and tell her that you don’t want her prized wedding china or that giant brown hutch she keeps it in. For that matter, nobody else wants it, either.

Much has been made of the impending “great wealth transfer” as baby boomers and the Silent Generation pass on a combined $84.4 trillion in wealth to younger generations. Getting less attention is the “great stuff transfer,” where everybody has to decipher what to do with the older generations’ things.

  • FaceDeer@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Personally, I think we should bring back the custom of grave goods. If there’s some precious heirloom that holds sentimental significance to a person but isn’t otherwise valuable or useful, why not bury it with them?

    I’m already thinking about getting some land and making an “indefinite time capsule” for storing a bunch of stuff that I have no use for but that I wouldn’t want to see go off to a landfill for sentimental reasons.

    • rocky1138@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I love that your last paragraph explains that you want to avoid things going into a landfill by reinventing a landfill.

      • ravhall@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Every time I pass a cemetery, I think, there’s a million bucks in jewelry just sitting there.

        • FaceDeer@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          We’d need to take some cues from how the ancients did it. Either arrange for long term security, like the Egyptians, or rely on secrecy, like the Mongols. It won’t work forever, but as long as it works for a couple of generations I’d be satisfied.

          One idea that comes to mind for modern grave goods would be to bury them in a nuclear waste disposal facility.

          • catloaf@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            54 minutes ago

            I don’t think we want to give an incentive to plunder nuclear waste.

      • FaceDeer@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I’m thinking more along the lines of future archaeologists. We learn so much about ancient cultures from what they bury with their dead, I figure we should return the favor.