What is it were missing? And how can we fit more pieces together to find out what to do?

  • neanderthal@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Sure, that is fine for you if you are not so poor that you can afford the more ethical option.

    ethical costing more than unethical is simply not always true. A bicycle is cheaper than a small car. A small car is cheaper than a canyonero. I’m in the US, I know bicycles aren’t feasible in most parts due to car dependent design, but nobody is forced to commute to an office in the suburbs in a monster truck.

    Poultry is cheaper than beef. Rice+beans+lentils is cheaper than meat.

    A reasonable house is cheaper than a mcmansion.

    • relay@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s not wrong to do any of those things, however systemic change would have a larger impact. I’d rather have stricter laws making it illegal to have factory farms and all beef be grass fed to better use the land to produce food rather than growing crops to feed them. That would be an efficient means of turning grasslands into food without exhausting the water supply. Yes there would be less beef, but this would be a net positive for the world if we did this.

      Its not wrong to try do do these little things yourself.