• Quik@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    2 months ago

    This is great news! It’s absolutely crazy how bad IPv6 adoption still is; it’s basically still impossible to run any service IPv6-only, even if it’s only for like, modern, expensive devices where I think it would be fairly reasonable to expect good support for “newer” standards.

    • breadsmasher@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      2 months ago

      Is it the cycle of “no one uses it so we dont support it -> we dont support it so no one can use it”?

      • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        2 months ago

        To me it’s more like IPv6 took so long to come out everybody just started using NAT. And that the addresses are long and weird.

      • osaerisxero@kbin.melroy.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        It is literally this, coupled with nobody having time to learn or implement something new. Honestly, this is like the one thing that FAANG have been unambiguously good for since their v6 adoption is excellent and is most of the observed v6 traffic.