• Metostopholes@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    154
    ·
    1 month ago

    Relevant XKCD:

    Title text: Sure, we could stop dictators and pandemics, but we could also make the signs on every damn diagram make sense.

  • PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    1 month ago

    Unrelated, but what is the origin of this image? I feel like I’ve seen it often over the years and don’t know where it came from originally.

  • JPSound@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 month ago

    Still not as fun as spin up/spin down quarks. Are they spinning? Not at all. And Charm quarks. What the hell does that even mean, science nerds? We also have the strange quark… aren’t they all really strange or have you just completely given up?

  • Etterra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    What if I told you the original selection of terms “positive” and “negative” was arbitrary?

    Anyway a positively charged electron exists. It’s called a positron.

    • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Bananas emit either a positron or an antiproton at an average of 1 every 90 minutes, IIRC. Eat your antimatter kids! The potassium is good for you.

    • Abnorc@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 month ago

      In Benjamin Franklin’s experiments, he came up with the convention that we use today to define a “positive” charge. As it turns out, electrons, discovered much later, are negatively charged according to the convention. Lots of chemical and physical reactions involve electrons as charge carriers, so lots of physical phenomena have this weird opposite thing going on. E.g. electric current or “conventional current” flows in the opposite direction of electron current. Chemical reactions are also weird. Reduction reactions involve a reduction in electric charge, but gaining an electron. The model works just fine, but it can be tricky and/or annoying at times.

    • grozzle@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      adding to abnorc’s excellent answer - circuit diagrams are all drawn as if charge carriers are positive (this is called “conventional current”), but because electrons are negative, this can get very confusing when you’re dealing with components where the flow of charge is one-way only (diodes, transistors, batteries, photometers…)

  • affiliate@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    this would also be society if counterclockwise and clockwise were swapped. it’s the universal way to talk about 2d rotations but pretty much nothing (except a clock) ends up turning clockwise. it didn’t have to be this way

    • grozzle@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      1 month ago

      that’s not arbitrary - the hour hand of a clock mimics the shadow of a sundial.

      it makes sense, in the northern hemisphere, where 90% of people live.

    • zqwzzle@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 month ago

      You can get a clock that is set up counter clockwise to mess with people

    • fishos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Ummm… Have you ever used a screw? Bottle cap? “Right tighty, lefty loosey”? A car wheel when going forward? Literally 99% of things tighten clockwise.

      You’re the person people have to say “no, your other left” a lot to, aren’t ya?

      • SqueakyBeaver@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Just wanna say, a car tire moves a different direction based on your perspective.

        If you’re looking at the driver side of the car, the tires move counterclockwise, whereas if you’re looking at the other side, the tires appear to rotate the other way.

        Perspective changes a lot of things, it’s pretty cool.

        edit: Driver side in my case is (when viewed from the back) the left side

      • affiliate@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        i don’t ever use bottle caps or cars. but in the case of screws (and bottle caps), the choice to make them tighten clockwise and loosen counter clockwise is entirely arbitrary.

        my main point is that i think it’s confusing that clockwise is negatively oriented and counterclockwise is positively oriented (in the mathematical sense). and the mathematical definition of orientation is ultimately dependent on trigonometry. and it just feels wrong that clocks are negatively oriented.

        You’re the person people have to say “no, your other left” a lot to, aren’t ya?

        no.

        • blind3rdeye@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 month ago

          I’m not sure why you’re saying its clocks that are wrong rather than the other stuff. Currently we have x = r cos(𝜃) and y = r sin(𝜃), and that’s what makes anti-clockwise rotations mathematically natural. But if we instead just used x = r sin(𝜃) and y = r cos(𝜃) then clockwise would be the natural positive rotation. And in that case, the unit circle would start at the top and go around clockwise… like we do for compass bearing (and clocks of course). So perhaps that would be better than changing what clocks do.

        • fishos@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          “the choice is arbitrary”.

          Except it’s not as many other have pointed out. You’re just confused and trying to spread your confusion to others. Yes, advanced math gets complex, that’s advanced math. Don’t drag trig into this when you’re just confused.

          • fishos@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            “the choice is arbitrary”.

            Except it’s not as many other have pointed out. You’re just confused and trying to spread your confusion to others. Yes, advanced math gets complex, that’s advanced math. Don’t drag trig into this when you’re just confused.

            Also “I don’t use bottle caps or cars”? Seriously just buzz off with that. You don’t live anywhere where you’re not using the simple machine of a screw. I hope Archimedes is rolling clockwise in his grave right now.

        • fishos@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Tighten = on/activated. You use a cap buy putting it on to seal the container. You out a screw in to join the wood. You do the thing it’s meant to do in a clockwise fashion.

          What’s the purpose of a cap? To keep things in. The purpose of the spout itself is to let them in.

          Clockwise wins.

  • nikaaa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    No, I think it makes sense.

    Living organisms use ions internally (positive charges) because they produce something (like fruits).

    Technology uses negative charges because it harvests those fruits, and takes them away (negative).

  • not_woody_shaw@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    I recognise the grandstand from the Marylebone Cricket Club, but they tore down the rest of the stadium. I guess that’s a good thing?