Dr. Wesker@lemmy.sdf.org to Showerthoughts@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agoMusic was better when ugly people were allowed to make itmessage-squaremessage-square197fedilinkarrow-up1697arrow-down1124
arrow-up1573arrow-down1message-squareMusic was better when ugly people were allowed to make itDr. Wesker@lemmy.sdf.org to Showerthoughts@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square197fedilink
minus-squareswim@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up24arrow-down9·2 days agoBut the contention is about music being better, and that’s some bad music.
minus-squareGraphy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up21arrow-down2·edit-22 days agoDid we read the same post? Music was better when ugly people were allowed to make it I guess your comment makes sense if you find those two attractive. Like I get the boomer joke of music these days sucks but my comment was leaning into joke.
minus-squarePlastic_Ramses@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down1·edit-22 days agoYeah, and Jack White aint pretty either. Imo, this post is better directed at hollywood
minus-squareswim@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down4·1 day agoYour comment makes sense in the frame of “ugly people are allowed to make music,” my comment refers to the “music was better” part of the post. The ugly people you mentioned don’t support your comment’s argument against the original assertion because their music is terrible, not “better.” Some music sucked in the boomer’s days, made by ugly and pretty people alike.
minus-squareIAmNotACat@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·1 day agoHe’s simply disputing the assertion that ugly people aren’t allowed to make music.
minus-squareswim@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down4·1 day agoYeah, that’s what the comment you replied to starts with.
minus-squareIAmNotACat@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·14 hours agoYeah so what’s your problem with what he said then?
minus-squareswim@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·10 hours agoWhy did you reply to my comment to restate the first part of what I said?
But the contention is about music being better, and that’s some bad music.
Did we read the same post?
I guess your comment makes sense if you find those two attractive.
Like I get the boomer joke of music these days sucks but my comment was leaning into joke.
Yeah, and Jack White aint pretty either.
Imo, this post is better directed at hollywood
Your comment makes sense in the frame of “ugly people are allowed to make music,” my comment refers to the “music was better” part of the post.
The ugly people you mentioned don’t support your comment’s argument against the original assertion because their music is terrible, not “better.”
Some music sucked in the boomer’s days, made by ugly and pretty people alike.
He’s simply disputing the assertion that ugly people aren’t allowed to make music.
Yeah, that’s what the comment you replied to starts with.
Yeah so what’s your problem with what he said then?
Why did you reply to my comment to restate the first part of what I said?