• teletext@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Maybe to the two dozen nix users. To all others dev containers are very well alive.

    • jim3692@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Docker is not only about dependency management. It also offers service “composing”, via docker compose, and network isolation for each service.

      Although I personally love Nix, and I run NixOS on some of my servers, I do not believe it can replace Docker/Podman. Unless you go the NixOS Containers route.

      • Wooki@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Interfaces,vlans and capable gateway. Except instead of the vendor lock in you have access to the gold standards of which all out scale

        • jim3692@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          I am trying to understand.

          Docker, which uses OCI containers that are supported by Docker, Podman, Containerd, systemd-nspawn, etc, is lock-in.

          But Nix Shells, which require Nix, are not lock-in.

          Also, how are you going to run Nix shells in VLANs? They run on the host’s network namespace.