• magiccupcake@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 months ago

    Ehh it’s still a rubbish idea, that money would be much better spent going after primary producers of energy, like solar, wind, geothermal, or nuclear.

    Some napkin math and an equivalent area of solar, say over a road or parking lot would produce 3.5 million kwh in a year.

    • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Those aren’t always a fit for everywhere. And getting energy from one place to another is an unsolved issue. Just because one option is cheaper than others doesn’t mean that particular option is the better choice. Diversity is very important.

      • magiccupcake@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Diversity is important, but it’s still better to go after larger sources of energy first. There’s just not much energy to be recovered from falling rain or waste from cars.

        Make the cars waste less energy, or the transit system in general is much easier and will actually save money long term.