I love mine and use it almost all the time. Its a Surfans f20 with rockbox native installed. Makes it feel like I’m using my old ipod lol

  • Man Zonder Poespas@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I see very little reason to use these over a regular smartphone 🤔 but the same is true for watches and people still rock those as well, so you do you! It does look like a nifty gadget.

    • bbbhltz@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      The reason is quality. Many smartphones have poor audio output quality. It’s all about the DAC (for digital to analogue conversion) and finding a phone you want (and can afford) that also has a good DAC leads people to invest in a stand-alone device. There are some LG devices, Sony obviously, but with phones dropping 3.5mm jacks they are becoming rarer.

      If you look at the comparisons here you’ll also notice that the prices get up there. Now, once you go hi-res DAP, you don’t go back. I am a bit of an audiophile, but I’m also a cheapskate. When I finally decided to get an OK DAP I went for entry-level device and entry-level in-ear (hi-res) buds and now I realise that I was not, in fact, an audiophile because now I notice the difference between lossy and lossless audio.

      Also, battery! I want to save my phone battery for phone stuff. My DAP lasts 7 or 8 days of going back and forth to work. Maybe more. It has a 20h battery. It also functions as a USB DAC, so I can plug it into a computer and it replaces the sound card so it is multifunction.

      • Man Zonder Poespas@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Those are all fair points! I guess my priorities are just different, in the sense that I care about the convenience of having to carry just one device in my pocket.

        On the topic of audiophiles, does quality really have such a big effect on the enjoyability of a song? Personally I’m perfectly fine with listening to 320kbps or even 256kbps through Bluetooth headphones.

        • bbbhltz@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          A 320kbps or 256 VBR mp3 is pretty decent, and if it is going over BT then the BT headphones play the role of the DAC in a way. So, if the headphones are OK then the sound will be OK. So far I only notice differences on my favourite albums and certain genres. Like country, folk, and especially bluegrass sound a lot better when I find a lossless 24bit version than the 320kbps mp3. Metal as well, and a handful of electronic and classic rock albums.

          • Man Zonder Poespas@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’ve always found it interesting that I cannot stand Nine Inch Nails on my BT headphones, but I really enjoy The Downward Spiral on my father’s good studio headphones.

            • bbbhltz@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Oh NIN… One of my first albums was Further Down the Spiral. Wow. What a discovery. Mind blown.

              Trent Reznor is a peculiar one though. He is opposed to digital music and thinks music should be enjoyed on a CD or vinyl. It wouldn’t surprise me that his work is mastered in a way that favours certain formats.