Another device heads to the Google graveyard.

  • dhtseany@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    And just like that I gave up on casting and shifted back to a dedicated streaming PC like it’s 2010. I changed the way I consumed my media for you, Google, and your thanks in return was betraying us by retiring the equipment that we came to rely on left and right. I’m still pissed about Chromecast audio.

    God I’m tired of this shit.

    • makyo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      4 months ago

      They’ve done this so many times now, one of these days we’ll know better

    • 7U5K3N@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      4 months ago

      Chromecast audio

      When they disco’d them I found like 6 at Walmart for 3.99.

      I bought them all. Lol

      They are still in a box… But Ill have a use for them… Probably

        • superterran@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          I’d rather my TV run smoothly, crippling performance to save $40 is not something I’m interested in, personally.

          • SteveFromMySpace@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            The response time to my phone is laggy/janky at times but the picture is crisp and clean once it’s going. If the picture itself has issues you have bad internet or a bad unit.

            I’ve got probably 6 or 7 chromecasts I use between my home and my parents’ home. Some are 5+ years old. Never had a single picture issue.

            • superterran@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              Comparing it to a Shield or Apple TV it’s clear how weak it was. In fairness, seems like they could just sell both but of course it’s important that Google have a performant offering

              • SteveFromMySpace@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                4 months ago

                It didn’t need to compete with them. From a consumer perspective it just needed to be functional at a fraction of the cost, which it was.

                I hate google at this point but chromecast did exactly what it needed to do. Always have one in my backpack when I travel. Sometimes “good enough” is all people want.

      • fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        I was thinking the same. Matter integration and a faster processor. I think the hard part for users is the price point. They’re “upgrading” the Chromecast, which is good, but they are using a higher tier product to do it, so it will be treated as a graveyard project.