• Contentedness@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Ok but the way I see it there are 100 people and 1000 tokens. Instead of every person getting 10 tokens, one guy has 998 tokens and everyone else argues over the remaining 2. Would killing the one rich guy not free up some tokens for the rest of us?

    • AIhasUse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yes, it frees up tokens, but it doesn’t make there be more items. As a result, people pay more for the items that do exist. It is the same as people saying the government should print a bunch of money to end poverty. They have the machines. They just don’t want us to have money, they could just print us all into being billionaires, and we could all live happily ever after!

      • Contentedness@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        I see what you’re saying, the tokens represent access to a finite amount of resources and creating more tokens won’t create more resources. I get that.

        But if the problem isn’t with the amount of resources but with their distribution, then redistributing the existing tokens out of the hands of the greedy hoarders must help the rest, mustn’t it?

        Edit: I can’t believe I’m sitting here arguing with someone on the goddamn Internet. Must be out of my damn mind