Shameless plug: I am the author.

  • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I’ve only ever heard of FHS or XDG. Due to the free nature of linux distros, there is no central authority on how they are to be set up, and so there is no difference between those two options in terms of authority. Standards (which XDG is, colloquially) are followed based on popularity.

    • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yeah, I fully get that. The post and comments were very specific about how if you dont follow XDG, you’re fucking up, while only generally saying that “everything would be better if everyone followed the same standard.”

      I pointed out that there are several standards and asked for a unique reason why XDG was the best to use.

      I still haven’t heard one, which is fine, but it undermines the “If youre not using, XDG youre a idiot” tone of the post and comments.

      • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        I think the logic is that it’s the most used, so to avoid seriously competing standards, it’s better to stick with it.

        • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          So far, thats the most specific reason someone has given to use XDG, but I dont think it accurate.

          FHS is the most used, as it’s been the primary linux filesystem standard for decades. Isn’t it better to stick with it if the only metric is popularity?