• Semjaza@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Ironically the Luddites were very aware the system was the problem, they made system changing demands.

      Mainstream history has decided to make them into a terrified of new technology pastiche of the truth.

    • kibiz0r@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Convincing the working class that tools the system creates are free of the system’s agenda may be an even greater achievement.

      Conspiring to jack up rent prices is exploitative when people do it. Is it any different when the RealPage algorithm does it indirectly?

      I don’t see any value in saying that human behavior is the problem but then specifically carving out an exception for the automated agents we create to amplify specific behaviors.

      When RedBubble ganks art and sells it on t-shirts, how is that different from when Stability ganks art and sells it at a text prompt?

      • DessertStorms@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        the RealPage algorithm

        Which was programmed by humans, with biases and vested interests based in and fuelled by capitalism and the rest of the kyriarchy

        I don’t see any value in saying that human behavior is the problem but then specifically carving out an exception for the automated agents we create to amplify specific behaviors.

        Human behaviours. Machines don’t have their own behaviours, only those humans have programmed them to have, again, with those same biases and vested interests based in and fuelled by capitalism and the rest of the kyriarchy

        When RedBubble ganks art and sells it on t-shirts, how is that different from when Stability ganks art and sells it at a text prompt?

        It isn’t, both are automated systems designed by humans, you guessed it - with those same biases and vested interests based in and fuelled by capitalism and the rest of the kyriarchy

        Convincing the working class that tools the system creates are free of the system’s agenda may be an even greater achievement.

        And only picking examples of ways in which technology is used that are explicitly for profit is cherry picking and twisting reality. The existence of things like FOSS and other ways in which people share technology or otherwise use it to improve society without any profit motive proves you wrong.

        AI isn’t intrinsically capitalist, just like computers aren’t, nor were steam engines or power looms. Capitalism convincing you that its way is the only way to use tools doesn’t mean that’s the reality, it only means the propaganda is working.

        • kibiz0r@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          So is RealPage not a tool, or are tools not inherently agenda-less?

          I’m not saying all technology is bad, but I am saying all technology is biased.

          And I’m not saying all AI must be exploitative, but its mechanics are such that the easiest path forward for it is exploitative.

  • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Nooooo we don’t want to do critical thinking and systemic analysis of root causes! Modernity bad! People lived better before antibiotics! Math is evil! /s

      • ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Doesn’t he specifically say capitalism is an improvement over pre-capitalism and a necessary step for industrialized society to reach socialism? He wouldn’t have called it a mistake unless he was really pissed

        • deaf_fish@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          Yes you are correct. I usually interpret people who say “capitalism was a mistake” to mean “to continue to peruse unregulated free market capitalism in light of all the evidence that is causes harm was a mistake”. I interpret it this way because I have never seen anyone who was seriously advocating for feudalism. I have seen a lot of people seriously advocating for socialism, communion, or unregulated free market capitalism.

          I figured you were one of the free market capitalist type when reading your initial comment because it seemed like your point was very nit-picky on the meme.

          Were you concerned that this meme was being made by someone who wants to return to feudalism?

    • Allero@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      When computers became mainstream and all sorts of media got into the open Web, many have seen this as the end of copyright history.

      But it wouldn’t be capitalism if it wouldn’t build sophisticated instruments and twist legislation in unprecedented ways only to protect publishers.

  • ComradeSharkfucker@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Capitalism was a necessary step in the development of socialism. It wasn’t a mistake, it’s just run its course. Just a technicality I know and I shouldn’t overanalyze but I felt it was worth stating

    • DessertStorms@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      That’s like saying “everything happens for a reason” to someone whose whole family has just been murdered.

      No. Capitalism was never necessary.

      • tweeks@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        But nothing is actually necessary. It depends on what you want to achieve.

        The speed of innovation might have gotten a big impulse by capitalism; I’m not sure if we’d technologically be where we are now otherwise. Of course one could argue that we do not need tech in its current form, which is fair.